Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #231Re: World's Raspberry Pi supply jammed in factory blunder
From: kreed
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:14
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:14
76 lines
4334 bytes
4334 bytes
On Mar 9, 1:11 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote: > On 9/03/2012 8:20 AM, Don McKenzie wrote: > > > On 09-Mar-12 8:17 AM, keithr wrote: > > >>> ==================================== > > >> What is it about the Pi that makes you want it to fail? Because your > >> attitude seems to indicate that that is what you want. > > > I am only reporting on what others are saying Keith, so that makes me > > the messenger. > > > Me, I have one on order, and am looking forward to it. > > Glad to hear it Don, its just that your posts seem to take some delight > in any Pi problems. I have no commercial interest in any of these products, or Don's business but I do admit that when I hear over and over of all these various problems I do admit that the more I read, I admit that I do wonder if someone with an interest in these devices are in some kind of serious trouble - whether it be financial, regulatory, or technical problems that cannot be fixed easily and are just pushing out various excuses to make people believe all is ok when it might not be. Reading the articles and forums linked here there tends to be this feel to it, of the kind I remember in the past when someone is having serious business problems and won't admit to them, and ultimately fail, usually losing other people's money in the process. I don't know Don personally, but in my opinion reading here over the years, I think that he is not the sort of person who would resort to "rubbishing" the PI for ONLY the reason that it might cost him sales. Rubbishing it for that reason alone would be futile, as it will succeed or fail regardless of Don's opinion, or whether the backers of it survive or fail - as if it is a great and popular device, and viable, someone else will soon start making it or a compatible. I think you will find that if the PI is successful in the market, does what it promises to do, and gets a good following he will jump right in, post about his experiences with it on here, and possibly do his best to have them in stock, or have a compatible version out, whether designed/made by him or a 3rd party In writing this, I'm giving my own personal opinion, it's not based on any facts but past experience in business and dealing with other people and firms over many years and am not saying or implying in any way that any organisation or product is or isn't in any sort of trouble or doing anything immoral or dishonest or that you should or shouldnt buy / support anything
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<b76505a6-3f2b-427c-99cf-b14267cbb3ca@x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni5744pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<9rscmiF6v6U1@mid.individual.net> <9rsl3tFavcU1@mid.individual.net> <4f5921d5@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <9rsm4mFhatU1@mid.individual.net> <4f5974ec$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,6aad4be616d8333a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f849b,6aad4be616d8333a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 103407,6aad4be616d8333a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid1617473143,gida2a404005f,gida5a6238865,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.220.229 with SMTP id pz5mr1971279pbc.5.1331286208518;
Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:43:28 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni5744pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: kreed <kenreed1999@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,comp.arch.embedded,aus.electronics
Subject: Re: World's Raspberry Pi supply jammed in factory blunder
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 01:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <b76505a6-3f2b-427c-99cf-b14267cbb3ca@x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com>
References: <9rscmiF6v6U1@mid.individual.net> <9rsl3tFavcU1@mid.individual.net>
<4f5921d5@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <9rsm4mFhatU1@mid.individual.net> <4f5974ec$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 115.69.27.210
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1331286201 23794 127.0.0.1 (9 Mar 2012 09:43:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 09:43:21 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=115.69.27.210; posting-account=o_cprwoAAABHiFoVjCVkBrgm2aLZBNsl
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0.2,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable