🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2418

Re: DSP for audio work

#2418
From: KG7HF
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:18
157 lines
6192 bytes
Igor,

My guess is that it is X grade.   Everything seems OK except there is some
booting issue.   Which doesn't seem to cause us much problem.

http://products.analog.com/products/info.asp?product=21161-HARDWARE


PD.





"Igor Korzinek" <igor.korzinek@inet.hr> wrote in message
news:a7pftr$ugb$1@sunce.iskon.hr...
> Hi,
> I collegue from our company and me also wanted to do some experiments
> with DSP in Audio. Actually to try to build some AC-3 stuff with active
> X-over...
> And we are waiting for the same AD (animal device:-).
>
> My Q is: the representative told us that they have some non-production
> silicon on
> the board. So is it buggy DSP or you can use it without problems ?
> Or you got a quote that allready contain the debugged, "production" 21161
?
>
> Igor
>
> "Johnny" <john_wr100@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3c9f052b.29785569@news.optusnet.com.au...
> > On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:31:58 -0500, "KG7HF" <KG7HF@amsat.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the advice PD and also thanks to Al.
> >
> > Yes I got a quote on the 21161 kit this today.  Its basically US$500..
> >
> >  Mutiple channels should give pretty awesome for my app.  and 600MFLOP
> > should allow higher sampling rates whether I need them or not. Pity
> > there dosen't appear to be any SP-DIF receivers or transmitters.  But
> > I could probably design a little daugher board to do this .. one
> > day...
> >
> > One thing that concerns me is that the evaluation kit is limited to
> > 8kb program size.  ie 2048 Words.   Should I assume this is going to
> > be more than enough for my FIR filter implementation?
> >
> > I wonder, is there separate memory space to store my filter
> > co-efficients... Because I will probably have nearly 2000 filter
> > coeficients which wouldn't leave a lot of space for program.
> >
> > Also I suppose the program must be stored in a low-speed flash memory
> > anyway, and probably gets loaded by the boot loader or external
> > micro..  Yes.. I got a lot more research to do.. Hopefully I will be
> > able to get a soft-copy of the users manual from the AD rep.
> > Obvioulsy I will study the data sheet.
> >
> > Thanks agian..
> > John.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >I agree, the 21161N EZ-Kit would be a good choice since you budget is
> $500.
> > >The debugger with the 21161N Ez-Kit is USB based, and is much faster
and
> > >more robust than that available with the 21065L EZ-Kit.  I think you
will
> > >also find that if you do run into any technical difficulties, you will
> get a
> > >much better responses using the newer evaluation boards.
> > >
> > >PD.
> > >
> > >
> > >"Al Clark" <dsp@danvillesignal.com> wrote in message
> > >news:Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101...
> > >> john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote in news:3c9db1ea.6888487
> > >> @news.optusnet.com.au:
> > >>
> > >> > On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:18:32 GMT, john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny)
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > I am planning on doing some experimentation with digital fitlers. I
> > >> > want to make an active crossover for my audio system. I was looking
> at
> > >> > one of the following kits:
> > >> >
> > >> > Motorola DSP5636X Evaluation module.
> > >> > or
> > >> > Analog devices ADSP-21065L Ez-Kit lite
> > >> >
> > >> > I probably need about 80 Million multiply/accumate per second and
at
> > >> > least 24bit fixed point. Faster is better though.
> > >> >
> > >> > I dont mind programming in Assembly or C language.  I figure that
> > >> > assembly is probably fine because my code should be pretty simple
> just
> > >> > to implement FIR filters and  I/O functions.  I was kind of scared
by
> > >> > roughly 1000 pages of documentation for the motorola development
> > >> > system and DSP programmers guide.
> > >> >
> > >> > Does anyone have experience with these kits?
> > >> > Which is easier to use, and will offer the best learning curve?
> > >> > Should I look at Texas Instuments or other DSPs?
> > >> > What kits are the best value for money?
> > >> >
> > >> > I was thinking of spending around US$500, but I might be able to
> > >> > extend that.
> > >> >
> > >> > best regards,
> > >> > Johnny
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Since you mentioned crossovers, I assume you need at least 4 channels
> of
> > >> DACs. I would get a 21161 EZ-Kit. This 21161 is much faster than the
> > >> 21065L. It also has SIMD hich will work very well for your
application.
> > >>
> > >> The EZ-Kit was 8 channels of 96kHz DACs.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Al Clark
> > >> Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff
> > >> Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <a7pvtn$hm52@nwd2nws1.analog.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.analog.com!not-for-mail
References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101> <3c9e5515@news.mdc.net> <3c9f052b.29785569@news.optusnet.com.au> <a7pftr$ugb$1@sunce.iskon.hr>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,d43e8f202cc9402f
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public
X-Google-Thread: 103407,d43e8f202cc9402f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public
X-Google-Thread: f8fcc,ad386b215662caf0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8fcc,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-26 06:23:27 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.analog.com!not-for-mail
From: "KG7HF" <KG7HF@amsat.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.dsp
Subject: Re: DSP for audio work
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:18:12 -0500
Organization: analog.com
Lines: 159
Message-ID: <a7pvtn$hm52@nwd2nws1.analog.com>
References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101> <3c9e5515@news.mdc.net> <3c9f052b.29785569@news.optusnet.com.au> <a7pftr$ugb$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.71.211.93
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700