Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2426Re: DSP for audio work
From: Johnny
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:23
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:23
111 lines
4711 bytes
4711 bytes
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:31:58 -0500, "KG7HF" <KG7HF@amsat.org> wrote: Thanks for the advice PD and also thanks to Al. Yes I got a quote on the 21161 kit this today. Its basically US$500.. Mutiple channels should give pretty awesome for my app. and 600MFLOP should allow higher sampling rates whether I need them or not. Pity there dosen't appear to be any SP-DIF receivers or transmitters. But I could probably design a little daugher board to do this .. one day... One thing that concerns me is that the evaluation kit is limited to 8kb program size. ie 2048 Words. Should I assume this is going to be more than enough for my FIR filter implementation? I wonder, is there separate memory space to store my filter co-efficients... Because I will probably have nearly 2000 filter coeficients which wouldn't leave a lot of space for program. Also I suppose the program must be stored in a low-speed flash memory anyway, and probably gets loaded by the boot loader or external micro.. Yes.. I got a lot more research to do.. Hopefully I will be able to get a soft-copy of the users manual from the AD rep. Obvioulsy I will study the data sheet. Thanks agian.. John. >I agree, the 21161N EZ-Kit would be a good choice since you budget is $500. >The debugger with the 21161N Ez-Kit is USB based, and is much faster and >more robust than that available with the 21065L EZ-Kit. I think you will >also find that if you do run into any technical difficulties, you will get a >much better responses using the newer evaluation boards. > >PD. > > >"Al Clark" <dsp@danvillesignal.com> wrote in message >news:Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101... >> john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote in news:3c9db1ea.6888487 >> @news.optusnet.com.au: >> >> > On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:18:32 GMT, john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote: >> > >> > I am planning on doing some experimentation with digital fitlers. I >> > want to make an active crossover for my audio system. I was looking at >> > one of the following kits: >> > >> > Motorola DSP5636X Evaluation module. >> > or >> > Analog devices ADSP-21065L Ez-Kit lite >> > >> > I probably need about 80 Million multiply/accumate per second and at >> > least 24bit fixed point. Faster is better though. >> > >> > I dont mind programming in Assembly or C language. I figure that >> > assembly is probably fine because my code should be pretty simple just >> > to implement FIR filters and I/O functions. I was kind of scared by >> > roughly 1000 pages of documentation for the motorola development >> > system and DSP programmers guide. >> > >> > Does anyone have experience with these kits? >> > Which is easier to use, and will offer the best learning curve? >> > Should I look at Texas Instuments or other DSPs? >> > What kits are the best value for money? >> > >> > I was thinking of spending around US$500, but I might be able to >> > extend that. >> > >> > best regards, >> > Johnny >> > >> > >> >> Since you mentioned crossovers, I assume you need at least 4 channels of >> DACs. I would get a 21161 EZ-Kit. This 21161 is much faster than the >> 21065L. It also has SIMD hich will work very well for your application. >> >> The EZ-Kit was 8 channels of 96kHz DACs. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Al Clark >> Danville Signal Processing, Inc. >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff >> Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3c9f052b.29785569@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!spool01.syd.optusnet.com.au!spool.optusnet.com.au!210.49.20.93.MISMATCH!not-for-mailReferences:
<3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101> <3c9e5515@news.mdc.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,d43e8f202cc9402f X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,d43e8f202cc9402f X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-Thread: f8fcc,ad386b215662caf0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8fcc,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-25 03:15:04 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!spool01.syd.optusnet.com.au!spool.optusnet.com.au!210.49.20.93.MISMATCH!not-for-mail From: john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.dsp Subject: Re: DSP for audio work Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:23:14 GMT Reply-To: john_wr100@yahoo.com Message-ID: <3c9f052b.29785569@news.optusnet.com.au> References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101> <3c9e5515@news.mdc.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 Lines: 112 NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.28.23.237 X-Trace: 1017054729 9990 211.28.23.237