Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2480Re: Ideas for auto-on circuit for 220 vac?
From: John Gilmer
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 23:39
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 23:39
62 lines
3511 bytes
3511 bytes
"DaveC" <anon@example.net> wrote in message news:01HW.B75F3E26002EF2D601D72810@news.dnai.com... > A friend has a custom woodworking business. He has several 220 3-phase > planers, sanders, etc. and a few 220 single-phase also. The shop is equipped > with a dust collection system (basically a large vacuum cleaner) that is > plumbed to most of the tools. Most of all of these tools are on their own > circuit breakers and wire runs. One small 110 vac saw is on a standard shared > plug-in 20 amp circuit. > > The fire inspector wants him to wire the dust collector such that it turns on > whenever any of the floor tools is turned on. > > I'm now sure how to sense the current in these circuits. Is there a standard > remote-turn-on relay that is used in circumstances such as this? Is there a > simple way to build a circuit to sense the tool startup? Controlling the dust > collector power seems pretty straightforward (220 single-phase). > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. According to the pros who post on ALT.HVAC there is a relay out there that you run a conductor through and when current flows, the relay closes. The relay is used to sense when a multispeed fan has been turned on. Unfortunately, I have not seen this relay in the Granger catalog. BUT, you would use one of these relays for each sawdust producing device and wire the contacts in parallel. OR You can just wire a "regular" relay coil of the appropriate voltage across ONE of the hot lines to each three phase load and to each regular (single phase) load. As above, you put the contacts in parallel to operate the vacumn motor. The "regular" relay is the way to go if your motors all operated in a single speed mode. The X10 folks market a current sensor but by the time you add the extra stuff you are better off with a $10 relay per sawdust producer. > -- > Note that my return address is corrupted in an attempt to reduce spam. If you > choose to e-mail me, please correct my address as described below. > > Thanks, > Dave > -- > Dave Carpenter > Sound Logic > voicebox@NOdnai.com > > Remove "NO" to reply via e-mail >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3b3a6fbd$0$3495@dingus.crosslink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.newsfirst.net!dingus.crosslink.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<01HW.B75F3E26002EF2D601D72810@news.dnai.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,9fac0384d7c8fda4 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,92c2e91c9ac17815,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-Thread: 1131b0,92c2e91c9ac17815,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1131b0,public X-Google-Thread: 10d137,92c2e91c9ac17815,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public X-Google-Thread: 107cee,92c2e91c9ac17815,start X-Google-Attributes: gid107cee,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-27 16:44:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.newsfirst.net!dingus.crosslink.net!not-for-mail From: "John Gilmer" <gilmer@crosslink.net> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.misc,alt.engineering.electrical,aus.electronics,sci.electronics.repair References: <01HW.B75F3E26002EF2D601D72810@news.dnai.com> Subject: Re: Ideas for auto-on circuit for 220 vac? Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:39:25 -0400 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Lines: 64 Message-ID: <3b3a6fbd$0$3495@dingus.crosslink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.199.164.119 X-Trace: dingus.crosslink.net 993685437 3495 207.199.164.119