🚀 go-pugleaf

John Fields wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:20:23 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:34:43 -0500, John Fields
>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 05:41:39 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:52:37 -0500, John Fields
>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:21:28 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> How much effort do you think it will take me to convince him he needs at 
>>>>>> least a dual trace oscilloscope for his lamp and battery circuits? Plus a 
>>>>>> pulse generator, a frequency generator, spectrum analyser, vector signal 
>>>>>> analyser, function generator, logic analyser and perhaps a time-domain 
>>>>>> reflectometer as well?
>>>>> ---
>>>>> If you could explain to me what the test equipment would be used
>>>>> for, or what the lamp would be tested for, then it wouldn't take
>>>>> much effort at all. For example, in order to determine the thermal
>>>>> response time of the lamp filament, one would use: (View in Courier)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .             P-CHANNEL           
>>>>> .+----+        MOSFET             +------+   
>>>>> .|OUT+|--------S   D-----+--------|CH1   |           
>>>>> .|    |          G       |     +--|GND   |
>>>>> .|OUT-|--+       |     [LAMP]  |  |      |
>>>>> .+----+  |       |       |     |  |      |
>>>>> .POWER  GND      |       +-----|--|CH2   |
>>>>> .SUPPLY          |       |     +--|GND   |
>>>>> .                |    [SHUNT]  |  +------+
>>>>> .                |       |    GND   DUAL
>>>>> .    +--------+  |      GND        CHANNEL
>>>>> .    |     OUT|--+                  SCOPE
>>>>> .    |        |
>>>>> .    |     GND|--+
>>>>> .    +--------+  |
>>>>> .     FUNCTION  GND
>>>>> .       GEN
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For other tests, other instruments in the list you provided might be
>>>>> used.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cordially,
>>>>
>>>> See?
>>> ---
>>> What did I tell ya? 
>>>
>>> Here's a perfectly reasonable test equipment setup used to measure
>>> the thermal time constant of an incandescent lamp filament, and it
>>> seems to me you're trying to pooh-pooh it with that non-sequitur
>>> "See?" crack.  That indicates, to me, that you _are_ a blowhard
>>> poseur and you _don't_ understand how to use electronic test
>>> equipment much more advanced than a digital multimeter.
>> In fact, I was pointing out to KM that I was right about how easy it
>> would be to make you justify buying all that test gear to work on your
>> lamp & battery circuits. Oh, & thanks for proving me correct, BTW.
> 
> ---
> http://www.literacycenter.net/
> 
> 

Loonel's too busy turning tricks and giving hummers to take a literacy 
course. His pimp will beat him if he doesn't earn enough money