Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2519Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*
From: light.angel
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:19
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:19
54 lines
4431 bytes
4431 bytes
MassiveDrongo wrote: > Thus spake The Demon Prince of Absurdity: >> Lionel wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:21:28 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote: >>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou nit. Though you bite so sharp at >>>> reasons, you are so empty of them. Ye leaked: >>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:00:37 -0500, John Fields wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:07:43 +1000, Lionel wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:47:48 -0500, John Fields wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>> You'd better behave or we will confiscate your multimeter. >>>>>>>>>>> Ha! I have TWO! >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> One for volts and the other one for amps? >>>>>>>>> Quite often, actually. And nearly as often for monitoring voltages >>>>>>>>> on different parts of a breadboard circuit. >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> Just one for volts should work well with just an incandescent lamp >>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>>>> and a battery in the circuit. >>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>>> Well then, that'll save you a little cash & bench space, won't it? >>>>>>> ;^) >>>>>> Why would I worry about that? >>>>> <sigh> Because you were just pointing out that you were only working >>>>> with simple lamp & battery circuits, so you only needed one meter, >>>>> instead of the two that I often require. So I politely observed that >>>>> /one/ meter will generally cost you less than /two/ meters, & that >>>>> /one/ meter would also likely take up less bench space than /two/ >>>>> meters, you see? I trust that was a little easier for you to grasp the >>>>> second time around. >>>>> >>>>>> I've got plenty of both, plus some test equipment and parts >>>>> For your lamp & battery circuits? What on earth for? You've already >>>>> admitted that you only need one meter to get the job done. Really, >>>>> rather than wasting good test gear, etc, you should sell it or give it >>>>> to someone who actually /needs/ lots of gear. >>>> How much effort do you think it will take me to convince him he needs >>>> at least a dual trace oscilloscope for his lamp and battery circuits? >>>> Plus a pulse generator, a frequency generator, spectrum analyser, >>>> vector signal analyser, function generator, logic analyser and perhaps >>>> a time-domain reflectometer as well? >>> Bugger-all, most likely. It's amazing what lame excuses a genuine >>> gearhead can come up with to justify buying the shiny new gizmo they saw >>> on the front cover of the latest issue of "Whatsit World". >> Talking to yerself again. Loonel==KY-MAN=="Rhonda and Massive Prong >> Stalker". > > Oh, my Goddess. Every time I think you've reached the nadir of > intelligence, you surprise me with whole new vistas of stupid. GaytonMcFagg0t yer so stoopid that yer off the stoopidty index chart. Inbreddedness is a fact of life in yer dysfunctional family. Were you gaybashed today, mcfagg0t?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<evnaui$8q3$1@aioe.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.newsland.it!aioe.org!not-for-mailReferences:
<evke2b$9g2$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <erhr131tlir7id801t3p5c60jci0is59f8@4ax.com> <evkls0$sd0$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <4c7s13hqrjo5blv8o78mlfhdi1vg2s2a91@4ax.com> <evlg08$5m5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <ri97k.i9q.19.1@news.alt.net> <evm20o$l44$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <S%wTh.18591$op4.2322@trnddc08> <pan.2007.04.13.06.58.41.869445@pathetic.loser>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,ff04e4273eed693a X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,46f33c8cc047e350 X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,46f33c8cc047e350 X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,250f961f377d0f03 X-Google-Thread: 109d17,250f961f377d0f03 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid10f7a7,gid111d0a,gid1082f5,gid109d17,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.newsland.it!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: "light.angel" <heavenorpurgatory@on.earth.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.electronics.basics,soc.men,aus.photo Subject: Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom* Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks,aus.photo Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:19:17 -0400 Organization: PWJWDFBC (People who just wont die from blood clots) Lines: 54 Message-ID: <evnaui$8q3$1@aioe.org> References: <evke2b$9g2$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <erhr131tlir7id801t3p5c60jci0is59f8@4ax.com> <evkls0$sd0$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <4c7s13hqrjo5blv8o78mlfhdi1vg2s2a91@4ax.com> <evlg08$5m5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <ri97k.i9q.19.1@news.alt.net> <evm20o$l44$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <S%wTh.18591$op4.2322@trnddc08> <pan.2007.04.13.06.58.41.869445@pathetic.loser> NNTP-Posting-Host: XJKT5ZXASw79ETjq0QrbrA.user.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)