🚀 go-pugleaf

Lionel wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:29:17 -0500, John Fields
> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:30:23 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:51:56 -0500, John Fields
>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:12:01 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:30:21 -0500, John Fields
>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:16:28 GMT, MassiveDrongo
>>>>>> <MassiveProng@tinydickinthebaratheendoftheuniverse.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thus spake John Fields:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:00:51 GMT, The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:44:06 -0500, John Fields did the cha-cha, and
>>>>>>>>> screamed:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 10:48:07 GMT, MassiveDrongo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Thus spake Kadaitcha Man:
>>>>>>>>>>>> MassiveDrongo <MassiveProng@tinydickinthebaratheendoftheuniverse.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thou inept recidivist. Thou infected pernicious caitiff. Ye
>>>>>>>>>>>> sniggered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thus spake Kadaitcha Man:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MassiveDrongo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <MassiveProng@tinydickinthebaratheendoftheuniverse.com> Thou odious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old white-bearded satan. Thou poisonous kite. Ye grumbled:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thus spake Kadaitcha Man:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MassiveDrongo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <MassiveProng@tinydickinthebaratheendoftheuniverse.com> Thou
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious in it. Experience, manhood, honour, ne'er before did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violate so itself. Ye twittered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thus spake John Fields:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:30:32 +1000, Lionel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:47:36 -0500, John Fields wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:28:13 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> Thou lackbeard.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whaaaat???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:gn2t13pqc21ej3rd0iumfman4plj7o3792@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thou be as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good a gentleman as the devil is, as Lucifer and Beelzebub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himself. Ye yammered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would I worry about that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I certainly made no direct reference to myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that so?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Up to that point, yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Notice that if the direct reference had come _before_ that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point there would have been no point in my asking why I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worry about it since I would have been the deferent.  As it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was, I asked because Lionel was still the deferent and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queried as to why I should worry since the situation was one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under which he was laboring, not I.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, I forgot to ask you how your humour-bypass surgery went.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have they taken the stiches out yet?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, let's see...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roses are red,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violets are blue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stiches are lines
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of poetry, Boo-Hoo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, seems they're still there...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My oh my, you are _such_ a talented typo-lam3r! Would you like a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surprise? A Unabomber Surprise?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on what? Typo lames?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, my, no. That was just the point where I decided to make the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nomination -- the evidence is all over the thread, and in earlier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are as many posts from you. By your own illogic, you also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> qualify.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But there are so many more self-congratulatory/self-admiring posts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from Fields, whereas I'm generally taking the piss...
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not about what you think you did.
>>>>>>>>>>> No, it's about John Fields and his continuing failure to post a joke at
>>>>>>>>>>> someone else's expense,
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> I was taught that the handicapped were not to be made fun of. ---
>>>>>>>>> I never make fun of Down's Syndrome people. Are you implying that you're
>>>>>>>>> among their numbers?
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> No, I'm alluding to that since someone is claiming that I continue to fail
>>>>>>>> to post jokes at others' expense, that the reason is because you're all
>>>>>>>> handicapped and I've been taught not to make fun of the handicapped.  It's
>>>>>>>> a joke, get it?  It also fulfilled the criterion of making a joke at
>>>>>>>> someone else's expense, but that obviously went right over your head, LOL,
>>>>>>>> so there may be some truth in that "handicapped" part!
>>>>>>> Oh, I got that it was an attempted joke, but that's all it was.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> while instead only striking a series of macho poses.
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> You don't see the humor in that?
>>>>>>>>> The humour that you seem to think is there and the humour that _is_ there
>>>>>>>>> are not the same humour.
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> The humor that's there is that what's been perceived as a "macho stance"
>>>>>>>> is actually a series of skewerings that have been performed which seem to
>>>>>>>> have been not quite in conformance with the wishes of some of the denizens
>>>>>>>> of alt.usenet.kooks.
>>>>>>> The humour of which I refer to in the latter case is the hilarious way 
>>>>>>> you have of showing off biceps that look like chicken bones.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Of course, when being viewed through a convex lens.
>>>>> Concave. actually.
>>>> ---
>>>> Yup.
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>> Not that you could be expected to know anything
>>>>> about optics. 
>>>> ---
>>>> About as much as you know about electronics.
>>> No, you don't know anywhere near that much about optics if you can
>>> make that basic a mistake.
>> ---
>> Brain fart is all... I must have been vexed at something because I
>> normally always remember that the negative lens "caves" in.
> 
> Heh.  Same mnemonic I use, AAMOF.
It's the jizz rattling around yer deformed head that makes you say 
something so stoopid, Loonel
> 
>>>> <(Oh, unless of course you're trying to say that your
>>>>> biceps normally look like toothpicks, obviously.)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Interesting, because some of them regularly beat themselves senseless with
>>>>>>>> blunter tools than foils.
>>>>>>> The PorchMonkey4Life does that an awful lot, true.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But, what about you? Honestly. In a group where insult one-upmanship
>>>>>>>> seems to be de rigueur, other than losing one's temper at having been
>>>>>>>> one-upped, what would you consider to be non-humorous?
>>>>>>> ...And where, exactly, did I "lose my temper", presuming that you're 
>>>>>>> still talking about me in the last sentence?
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> I wasn't, but thinking it over, causing someone to lose their temper
>>>>>> would be humorous, so never mind.
>>>>> I've certainly generated plenty of laughs that way at the expense of
>>>>> you & Prongo The Drongo.
>>>> ---
>>>> Laugh tracks don't count.
>>> We don't neeed laugh tracks, Hon - we know when we're seeing something
>>> funny.
>> ---
>> NIH ain't funny?
> 
> Wouldn't know.
You have no formal education so of course yer ignorant of nearly 
everything, Loonel
>