Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2529Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*
From: Henry Schmidt
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:37
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:37
187 lines
9043 bytes
9043 bytes
Lionel wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:01:54 -0500, John Fields > <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:30:48 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:44:24 -0500, John Fields >>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:15:43 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:11:08 -0500, John Fields >>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:00:24 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:36:55 -0500, John Fields >>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:10:57 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:49:05 -0500, John Fields >>>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:35:53 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, believe it or not. I wouldn't fall off my chair in shock if he >>>>>>>>>>> were to admit to still being a virgin. >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> Five grandchildren. >>>>>>>>> Never heard of adoption, step-children, artifical insemination or >>>>>>>>> extra-marital affairs? >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> Artificial insemination requires masturbation, which technically >>>>>>>> obviates voluntary virginity. >>>>>>> I doubt that yours would be voluntary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Extra-marital sex inherently implies >>>>>>>> the loss of virginity because of that loss in the original marriage. >>>>>>> Marriages aren't always consummated, John. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Still, the extra-marital fling does away with virginity unless the >>>>>> fling is platonic. >>>>> You thought I was talking about /you/ having an affair? - That >>>>> figures. >>>> --- >>>> No, I didn't, but that figures. >>> No? - Then how would your wife having an extra-marital affair remove >>> /your/ virginity? >>> >>>>>>>> You just don't know what the fuck you're talking about, do you? ;) >>>>>>> ...sayd the dweeb who thinks that masturbation cures virginity. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> It doesn't? >>>>> Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings, dude. >>>> --- >>> >From what I've seen of you so far, quite the opposite seems to be >>>> true. >>> True, I was being more than a little sarcastic there. >>> >>>> Matter of fact, had you been the Angel of the Annunciation, Mary >>>> would probably have gone looking for an abortion. >>> Now /that/ would be an achievement to be proud of. >> --- >> So, you worship suffering and death? > > Of religion? - Hell yes. > >>>>>>>>> I can see that you're not all that clear on the mechanics of the >>>>>>>>> process. >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> Oh yeah, the old in-and-out... It's so hard to figure out... >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The oldest starting college next year. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And you? >>>>>>>>> Are you asking me about my sex life (pretty damn good lately), whether >>>>>>>>> I have any kids, or whether I have any grandkids? >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> Certainly not the first, since it matters little to me whether your >>>>>>>> local pound has seen fit to open its doors to overnight conjugal >>>>>>>> visitors. >>>>>>> *snort* Like most men, I'd be lying if I claimed to have never woken >>>>>>> up next to a few woofers, but most of the women I've been involved >>>>>>> with have been very attractive, & quite a few have been gorgeous. >>>>>>> Eg; <http://lo.ve.ly/gallery/Usenet/LK0M4204_135mm> with whom I had my >>>>>>> 4th anniversary a couple of months ago. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Goddam, Lionel, what's it like to go through life with only one arm? >>>>> Okay, on this one, I'll cheerfully admit that I don't have the >>>>> faintest idea what you're trying to say. If it was intended to be an >>>>> insult of some sort, you might want to rephrase it. >>>> --- >>>> OK, let me try to put this as delicately as I can: >>>> >>>> You post a picture of your GF and I reply with: "What's it like to >>>> go through life with only one arm?" Have you led such a sheltered >>>> life that you can't put two and two together? >>> So it would seem, because I still don't get the joke. >> --- >> Oh, well... One day you will. >> --- >> >>>>>>>> Other than that, I would be interested in knowing what overhead >>>>>>>> you've foisted on the planet. >>>>>>> Sure. One son, so far. And how many biological children do you have, >>>>>>> Johnny? >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Five, and five grandchildren. >>>>> Any of the paternity tests come back positive? >>>> --- >>>> Yes, they all had fathers. >>> Well, at least that rules out parthenogenesis, eh? >> --- >> Hey! You know a BIG WORD! > > Well spotted, Mr Swirly. You do know what 'parthenogenesis' means, > right? (Hint: You can check it out at dictionary.com, & pretend that > you already knew what it meant when you reply to this post.) > >>>>>>>>>> Like I said earlier, "When the joke's on you, it seldom seems >>>>>>>>>> funny." >>>>>>>>> Well, seeing as something like five different posters have posted to >>>>>>>>> that part of the thread, & you're the only one who thought it was >>>>>>>>> funny, I know which possibility /I'd/ bet on. >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> Why am I not surprised? The inability to perceive humor doesn't >>>>>>>> mean that humor doesn't exist, all it means is that you're so full >>>>>>>> of yourselves that you can't step outside of yourselves and laugh at >>>>>>>> your own foibles. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is, it's always funny when you get to laugh at someone else's >>>>>>>> foolishness, but it's never funny when they get to laugh at yours, >>>>>>>> eh? >>>>>>> Oh, every now & then someone makes one at my expense that I can't help >>>>>>> but laugh at. It doesn't seem at all likely that it's something you'll >>>>>>> ever achieve, SwirlyBoi. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> We'll see, Nellie. :-) >>>>> Go for your life, Swirly. If I get bored, I'll just stop replying to >>>>> you directly. >>>> --- >>>> No chance of that happening, huh...? >>> Given that I still flame DoucheMonkey every now & then, you'd have to >>> work pretty hard at it, yes. >> --- >> "Flame"??? > > Oh, you must know what the word 'flame' means, surely? > >>>> "And I went down to the demonstration >>>> To get my fair share of abuse >>>> Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration >>>> If we don't we're gonna blow a 50-amp fuse" >>>> >>>> Sing it to me now... >>>> >>>> You can't always get what you want >>>> You can't always get what you want >>>> You can't always get what you want >>>> But if you try sometimes well you just might find >>>> You get what you need" >>>> >>>> "You Can't Always Get What You Want" >>>> Rolling Stones >>>> >>>> and: >>>> >>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coyote+ugly >>>> >>>> and a look into the future, at the early twenties of your firstborn: >>>> >>>> http://www.cybersalt.org/cleanlaugh/images/04/doghumanface.htm >>> Lame. >> Lame. > > "Echo... echo... eco... co.." > > Boring old fuckwit. Ooogly poofter as$clown >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<UdaVh.9032$h8.4644@trnddc06>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!130.81.64.211.MISMATCH!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mailReferences:
<evm57c$t2a$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vi9t13lqmnq2ihuu4mepsstpakp44ub2ck@4ax.com> <evmapq$doi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <q0vv13ddud9qm32cdjdn6661ui68hnebhs@4ax.com> <evs0vq$qlt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <va84239ir4o5tulo4747kodv2abmmlg6o6@4ax.com> <evtj3i$6ea$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <e56523di8v2o0hn10gd9r517m5n4r3nni4@4ax.com> <evun5b$6sn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com> <f02gu7$bbc$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,ff04e4273eed693a X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,46f33c8cc047e350 X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,46f33c8cc047e350 X-Google-Thread: 109d17,250f961f377d0f03 X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,250f961f377d0f03 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid10f7a7,gid111d0a,gid109d17,gid1082f5,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!130.81.64.211.MISMATCH!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mail From: Henry Schmidt <schmitty@nottelling.nope> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.electronics.basics,aus.photo,soc.men Subject: Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom* References: <evm57c$t2a$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vi9t13lqmnq2ihuu4mepsstpakp44ub2ck@4ax.com> <evmapq$doi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <q0vv13ddud9qm32cdjdn6661ui68hnebhs@4ax.com> <evs0vq$qlt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <va84239ir4o5tulo4747kodv2abmmlg6o6@4ax.com> <evtj3i$6ea$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <e56523di8v2o0hn10gd9r517m5n4r3nni4@4ax.com> <evun5b$6sn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com> <f02gu7$bbc$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> In-Reply-To: <f02gu7$bbc$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 187 Message-ID: <UdaVh.9032$h8.4644@trnddc06> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:37:08 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.89.43.216 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trnddc06 1176842228 138.89.43.216 (Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:37:08 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:37:08 EDT