🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2529

Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*

#2529
From: Henry Schmidt
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:37
187 lines
9043 bytes
Lionel wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:01:54 -0500, John Fields
> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:30:48 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:44:24 -0500, John Fields
>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:15:43 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:11:08 -0500, John Fields
>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:00:24 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:36:55 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:10:57 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:49:05 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:35:53 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, believe it or not. I wouldn't fall off my chair in shock if he
>>>>>>>>>>> were to admit to still being a virgin.
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> Five grandchildren.
>>>>>>>>> Never heard of adoption, step-children, artifical insemination or
>>>>>>>>> extra-marital affairs? 
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Artificial insemination requires masturbation, which technically
>>>>>>>> obviates voluntary virginity.
>>>>>>> I doubt that yours would be voluntary.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Extra-marital sex inherently implies
>>>>>>>> the loss of virginity because of that loss in the original marriage.
>>>>>>> Marriages aren't always consummated, John.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Still, the extra-marital fling does away with virginity unless the
>>>>>> fling is platonic.
>>>>> You thought I was talking about /you/ having an affair? - That
>>>>> figures.
>>>> ---
>>>> No, I didn't, but that figures.
>>> No? - Then how would your wife having an extra-marital affair remove
>>> /your/ virginity?
>>>
>>>>>>>> You just don't know what the fuck you're talking about, do you? ;)
>>>>>>> ...sayd the dweeb who thinks that masturbation cures virginity.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> It doesn't?
>>>>> Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings, dude.
>>>> ---
>>> >From what I've seen of you so far,  quite the opposite seems to be
>>>> true.
>>> True, I was being more than a little sarcastic there.
>>>
>>>> Matter of fact, had you been the Angel of the Annunciation, Mary
>>>> would probably have gone looking for an abortion. 
>>> Now /that/ would be an achievement to be proud of.
>> ---
>> So, you worship suffering and death?
> 
> Of religion? - Hell yes.
> 
>>>>>>>>> I can see that you're not all that clear on the mechanics of the
>>>>>>>>> process.
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Oh yeah, the old in-and-out... It's so hard to figure out...
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The oldest starting college next year.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And you?
>>>>>>>>> Are you asking me about my sex life (pretty damn good lately), whether
>>>>>>>>> I have any kids, or whether I have any grandkids?
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Certainly not the first, since it matters little to me whether your
>>>>>>>> local pound has seen fit to open its doors to overnight conjugal
>>>>>>>> visitors.
>>>>>>> *snort* Like most men, I'd be lying if I claimed to have never woken
>>>>>>> up next to a few woofers, but most of the women I've been involved
>>>>>>> with have been very attractive, & quite a few have been gorgeous.
>>>>>>> Eg; <http://lo.ve.ly/gallery/Usenet/LK0M4204_135mm> with whom I had my
>>>>>>> 4th anniversary a couple of months ago.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Goddam, Lionel, what's it like to go through life with only one arm?
>>>>> Okay, on this one, I'll cheerfully admit that I don't have the
>>>>> faintest idea what you're trying to say. If it was intended to be an
>>>>> insult of some sort, you might want to rephrase it.
>>>> ---
>>>> OK, let me try to put this as delicately as I can:
>>>>
>>>> You post a picture of your GF and I reply with: "What's it like to
>>>> go through life with only one arm?"  Have you led such a sheltered
>>>> life that you can't put two and two together?
>>> So it would seem, because I still don't get the joke.
>> ---
>> Oh, well... One day you will.
>> ---
>>
>>>>>>>> Other than that, I would be interested in knowing what overhead
>>>>>>>> you've foisted on the planet.
>>>>>>> Sure. One son, so far. And how many biological children do you have,
>>>>>>> Johnny?
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Five, and five grandchildren.
>>>>> Any of the paternity tests come back positive?
>>>> ---
>>>> Yes, they all had fathers.  
>>> Well, at least that rules out parthenogenesis, eh?
>> ---
>> Hey! You know a BIG WORD!
> 
> Well spotted, Mr Swirly. You do know what 'parthenogenesis' means,
> right? (Hint: You can check it out at dictionary.com, & pretend that
> you already knew what it meant when you reply to this post.)
> 
>>>>>>>>>> Like I said earlier, "When the joke's on you, it seldom seems
>>>>>>>>>> funny."
>>>>>>>>> Well, seeing as something like five different posters have posted to
>>>>>>>>> that part of the thread, & you're the only one who thought it was
>>>>>>>>> funny, I know which possibility /I'd/ bet on.
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Why am I not surprised?  The inability to perceive humor doesn't
>>>>>>>> mean that humor doesn't exist, all it means is that you're so full
>>>>>>>> of yourselves that you can't step outside of yourselves and laugh at
>>>>>>>> your own foibles.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is, it's always funny when you get to laugh at someone else's
>>>>>>>> foolishness, but it's never funny when they get to laugh at yours,
>>>>>>>> eh?
>>>>>>> Oh, every now & then someone makes one at my expense that I can't help
>>>>>>> but laugh at. It doesn't seem at all likely that it's something you'll
>>>>>>> ever achieve, SwirlyBoi.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> We'll see, Nellie. :-)
>>>>> Go for your life, Swirly. If I get bored, I'll just stop replying to
>>>>> you directly.
>>>> ---
>>>> No chance of that happening, huh...? 
>>> Given that I still flame DoucheMonkey every now & then, you'd have to
>>> work pretty hard at it, yes.
>> ---
>> "Flame"???
> 
> Oh, you must know what the word 'flame' means, surely? 
> 
>>>> "And I went down to the demonstration
>>>> To get my fair share of abuse
>>>> Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration
>>>> If we don't we're gonna blow a 50-amp fuse"
>>>>
>>>> Sing it to me now...
>>>>
>>>> You can't always get what you want
>>>> You can't always get what you want
>>>> You can't always get what you want
>>>> But if you try sometimes well you just might find
>>>> You get what you need"
>>>>
>>>> "You Can't Always Get What You Want"
>>>> Rolling Stones
>>>>
>>>> and:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coyote+ugly
>>>>
>>>> and a look into the future, at the early twenties of your firstborn:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cybersalt.org/cleanlaugh/images/04/doghumanface.htm
>>> Lame.
>> Lame.
> 
> "Echo... echo... eco... co.."
> 
> Boring old fuckwit.

Ooogly poofter as$clown
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <UdaVh.9032$h8.4644@trnddc06>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!130.81.64.211.MISMATCH!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mail
References: <evm57c$t2a$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vi9t13lqmnq2ihuu4mepsstpakp44ub2ck@4ax.com> <evmapq$doi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <q0vv13ddud9qm32cdjdn6661ui68hnebhs@4ax.com> <evs0vq$qlt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <va84239ir4o5tulo4747kodv2abmmlg6o6@4ax.com> <evtj3i$6ea$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <e56523di8v2o0hn10gd9r517m5n4r3nni4@4ax.com> <evun5b$6sn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com> <f02gu7$bbc$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,ff04e4273eed693a
X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,46f33c8cc047e350
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,46f33c8cc047e350
X-Google-Thread: 109d17,250f961f377d0f03
X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,250f961f377d0f03
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid10f7a7,gid111d0a,gid109d17,gid1082f5,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!130.81.64.211.MISMATCH!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mail
From: Henry Schmidt <schmitty@nottelling.nope>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.electronics.basics,aus.photo,soc.men
Subject: Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*
References: <evm57c$t2a$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vi9t13lqmnq2ihuu4mepsstpakp44ub2ck@4ax.com> <evmapq$doi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <q0vv13ddud9qm32cdjdn6661ui68hnebhs@4ax.com> <evs0vq$qlt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <va84239ir4o5tulo4747kodv2abmmlg6o6@4ax.com> <evtj3i$6ea$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <e56523di8v2o0hn10gd9r517m5n4r3nni4@4ax.com> <evun5b$6sn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com> <f02gu7$bbc$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
In-Reply-To: <f02gu7$bbc$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 187
Message-ID: <UdaVh.9032$h8.4644@trnddc06>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:37:08 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.89.43.216
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: trnddc06 1176842228 138.89.43.216 (Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:37:08 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:37:08 EDT