Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2531Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*
From: MassiveDrongo
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:39
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:39
61 lines
5094 bytes
5094 bytes
Thus spake light.angel: > MassiveDrongo wrote: >> Thus spake The Demon Prince of Absurdity: >>> Lionel wrote: >>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:21:28 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote: >>>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou nit. Though you bite so sharp at >>>>> reasons, you are so empty of them. Ye leaked: >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:00:37 -0500, John Fields wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:07:43 +1000, Lionel wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:47:48 -0500, John Fields wrote: >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd better behave or we will confiscate your multimeter. >>>>>>>>>>>> Ha! I have TWO! >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> One for volts and the other one for amps? >>>>>>>>>> Quite often, actually. And nearly as often for monitoring >>>>>>>>>> voltages on different parts of a breadboard circuit. >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> Just one for volts should work well with just an incandescent >>>>>>>>> lamp >>>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>>>>> and a battery in the circuit. >>>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>>>> Well then, that'll save you a little cash & bench space, won't it? >>>>>>>> ;^) >>>>>>> Why would I worry about that? >>>>>> <sigh> Because you were just pointing out that you were only working >>>>>> with simple lamp & battery circuits, so you only needed one meter, >>>>>> instead of the two that I often require. So I politely observed that >>>>>> /one/ meter will generally cost you less than /two/ meters, & that >>>>>> /one/ meter would also likely take up less bench space than /two/ >>>>>> meters, you see? I trust that was a little easier for you to grasp >>>>>> the second time around. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've got plenty of both, plus some test equipment and parts >>>>>> For your lamp & battery circuits? What on earth for? You've already >>>>>> admitted that you only need one meter to get the job done. Really, >>>>>> rather than wasting good test gear, etc, you should sell it or give >>>>>> it to someone who actually /needs/ lots of gear. >>>>> How much effort do you think it will take me to convince him he needs >>>>> at least a dual trace oscilloscope for his lamp and battery circuits? >>>>> Plus a pulse generator, a frequency generator, spectrum analyser, >>>>> vector signal analyser, function generator, logic analyser and >>>>> perhaps a time-domain reflectometer as well? >>>> Bugger-all, most likely. It's amazing what lame excuses a genuine >>>> gearhead can come up with to justify buying the shiny new gizmo they >>>> saw on the front cover of the latest issue of "Whatsit World". >>> Talking to yerself again. Loonel==KY-MAN=="Rhonda and Massive Prong >>> Stalker". >> >> Oh, my Goddess. Every time I think you've reached the nadir of >> intelligence, you surprise me with whole new vistas of stupid. > > GaytonMcFagg0t yer so stoopid that yer off the stoopidty index chart. > Inbreddedness is a fact of life in yer dysfunctional family. Keep on making new standards for irony, there, Monkey. > Were you gaybashed today, mcfagg0t? Not in over seven years, no. And four months.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<pan.2007.04.14.02.39.19.676255@pathetic.loser>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out04b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<evke2b$9g2$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <erhr131tlir7id801t3p5c60jci0is59f8@4ax.com> <evkls0$sd0$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <4c7s13hqrjo5blv8o78mlfhdi1vg2s2a91@4ax.com> <evlg08$5m5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <ri97k.i9q.19.1@news.alt.net> <evm20o$l44$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <S%wTh.18591$op4.2322@trnddc08> <pan.2007.04.13.06.58.41.869445@pathetic.loser> <evnaui$8q3$1@aioe.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,ff04e4273eed693a X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,46f33c8cc047e350 X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,46f33c8cc047e350 X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,250f961f377d0f03 X-Google-Thread: 109d17,250f961f377d0f03 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid10f7a7,gid111d0a,gid1082f5,gid109d17,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out04b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 70.68.181.129 From: MassiveDrongo <MassiveProng@tinydickinthebaratheendoftheuniverse.com> Organization: Puffed-up Lying Chickenhawks Subject: Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom* User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Message-ID: <pan.2007.04.14.02.39.19.676255@pathetic.loser> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.electronics.basics,soc.men,aus.photo References: <evke2b$9g2$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <erhr131tlir7id801t3p5c60jci0is59f8@4ax.com> <evkls0$sd0$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <4c7s13hqrjo5blv8o78mlfhdi1vg2s2a91@4ax.com> <evlg08$5m5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <ri97k.i9q.19.1@news.alt.net> <evm20o$l44$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <S%wTh.18591$op4.2322@trnddc08> <pan.2007.04.13.06.58.41.869445@pathetic.loser> <evnaui$8q3$1@aioe.org> Reply-To: Chas. E. Pemberton <MasiveProng@yourhiney.org> X-COOSN: 029-06-71069 X-More-Complaints-To: X-Complaints-To: admin@cox.net X-My-Secret-NNTP-Posting-Host: NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.197.137.68 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 61 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:39:24 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176 X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1176518364 64.59.135.176 (Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:39:24 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:39:24 MDT