🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2544

Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*

#2544
From: The Secretary of HomIntern
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:49
54 lines
4032 bytes
Lionel wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:00:37 -0500, John Fields
> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:07:43 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:47:48 -0500, John Fields
>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>>>>>>> You'd better behave or we will confiscate your multimeter.
>>>>>>> Ha! I have TWO!
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> One for volts and the other one for amps?
>>>>> Quite often, actually. And nearly as often for monitoring voltages on
>>>>> different parts of a breadboard circuit.
>>>> ---
>>>> Just one for volts should work well with just an incandescent lamp
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> and a battery in the circuit.
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> Well then, that'll save you a little cash & bench space, won't it? ;^)
>> Why would I worry about that?
> 
> <sigh> Because you were just pointing out that you were only working
> with simple lamp & battery circuits, so you only needed one meter,
> instead of the two that I often require. So I politely observed that
> /one/ meter will generally cost you less than /two/ meters, & that
> /one/ meter would also likely take up less bench space than /two/
> meters, you see? I trust that was a little easier for you to grasp the
> second time around.

How many times must John beat you about yer deformed head before it 
sinks in looney loonel da poofter.
> 
>> I've got plenty of both, plus some test equipment and parts
> 
> For your lamp & battery circuits? What on earth for? You've already
> admitted that you only need one meter to get the job done.
> Really, rather than wasting good test gear, etc, you should sell it or
> give it to someone who actually /needs/ lots of gear.
> 
>> you'd
>> drool over if you ever made it past Ohm's law and LEDs. I think the
>> likelihood of the front of your shirt staying dry is prettty high,
>> however. 
> 
> Oh dear, that's terribly lame, especially coming from someone who is,
> theoretically, an adult. Y<Looney Loonel $hitflinging rant schnipped>
Pot.Kettle.Black.Tard!

John *owns* ya little pathetic loonel.

> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5juTh.3000$vo2.2139@trnddc01>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!130.81.64.211.MISMATCH!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc01.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mail
References: <AGdTh.50$382.47@newsfe02.lga> <j3uq13hqpbg3nnsm0aq7tlgogk2nc70ro8@4ax.com> <WqydnZn2J8NAHoDbnZ2dnUVZ_o7inZ2d@giganews.com> <evk4sv$fro$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <evk4vl$fs6$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vldr135j55743ctbnbfcvqpj5002vlii6h@4ax.com> <evke2b$9g2$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <erhr131tlir7id801t3p5c60jci0is59f8@4ax.com> <evkls0$sd0$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <4c7s13hqrjo5blv8o78mlfhdi1vg2s2a91@4ax.com> <evlg08$5m5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,ff04e4273eed693a
X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,46f33c8cc047e350
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,46f33c8cc047e350
X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,250f961f377d0f03
X-Google-Thread: 109d17,250f961f377d0f03
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid10f7a7,gid111d0a,gid1082f5,gid109d17,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!130.81.64.211.MISMATCH!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc01.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mail
From: The Secretary of HomIntern <YkR4N53909@WoeM.6Ro>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.electronics.basics,soc.men,aus.photo
Subject: Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*
References: <AGdTh.50$382.47@newsfe02.lga> <j3uq13hqpbg3nnsm0aq7tlgogk2nc70ro8@4ax.com> <WqydnZn2J8NAHoDbnZ2dnUVZ_o7inZ2d@giganews.com> <evk4sv$fro$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <evk4vl$fs6$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vldr135j55743ctbnbfcvqpj5002vlii6h@4ax.com> <evke2b$9g2$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <erhr131tlir7id801t3p5c60jci0is59f8@4ax.com> <evkls0$sd0$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <4c7s13hqrjo5blv8o78mlfhdi1vg2s2a91@4ax.com> <evlg08$5m5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
In-Reply-To: <evlg08$5m5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <5juTh.3000$vo2.2139@trnddc01>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:49:53 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.153.203.17
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: trnddc01 1176400193 141.153.203.17 (Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:49:53 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:49:53 EDT