Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #259Re: OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor?
From: Paul
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:13
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:13
30 lines
3082 bytes
3082 bytes
In article <jjdt7n$373$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Anders.Montonen@kapsi.spam.stop.fi.invalid says... > > In comp.arch.embedded Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> wrote: > > In article <4f59a5a8$0$6882$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>, usenet+5@c- > > scape.nl says... > >> If the classroom already has computers, you don't need to get the > >> Raspberry Pi at all. Just let the kids use the regular computers. > > Yes you do as IT services will not allow loading of packet sniffers > > practicals with network addressing, subnets and a myriad of other things > > done to those systems. > > The Model A that is intended for classrooms does not have on-board Ethernet. > > -a What is intended and what will be bought for various curricula is different, as I have dealings with ICT/Computing teachers in UK most are actually interested in Model B not A, hard wired LAN is easier as lots of building have no wifi or wifi blackspots. Anyway adding wifi may seem cheap until you lose opne or two a lesson and more bits to check in and out. -- Paul Carpenter | paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk <http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/> PC Services <http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/fonts/> Timing Diagram Font <http://www.gnuh8.org.uk/> GNU H8 - compiler & Renesas H8/H8S/H8 Tiny <http://www.badweb.org.uk/> For those web sites you hate
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.29c490dd60bde54e98970d@172.16.0.1>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni7784pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<9rq432FqvmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f57e1e1.3850429078@news.kpn.nl> <9rq6pgFg3mU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.29c1fe3dc64abf34989704@172.16.0.1> <9rqardFd05U1@mid.individual.net> <4f580081.3858269265@news.kpn.nl> <9rqf87FadnU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.29c2e7dee9e96d73989706@172.16.0.1> <4f59230c$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <MPG.29c33af090e5be4c989707@172.16.0.1> <4f59a5a8$0$6882$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <MPG.29c3df25555ebf8c989709@172.16.0.1> <jjdt7n$373$1@speranza.aioe.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 103407,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f849b,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid1617473143,gida5a6238865,gida2a404005f,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr3230646pbv.0.1331332204258;
Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni7784pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor?
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 22:13:25 -0000
Organization: PC Services
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <MPG.29c490dd60bde54e98970d@172.16.0.1>
References: <9rq432FqvmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f57e1e1.3850429078@news.kpn.nl> <9rq6pgFg3mU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.29c1fe3dc64abf34989704@172.16.0.1> <9rqardFd05U1@mid.individual.net> <4f580081.3858269265@news.kpn.nl> <9rqf87FadnU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.29c2e7dee9e96d73989706@172.16.0.1> <4f59230c$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <MPG.29c33af090e5be4c989707@172.16.0.1> <4f59a5a8$0$6882$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <MPG.29c3df25555ebf8c989709@172.16.0.1> <jjdt7n$373$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net TrPuO9tsxsWUOPm0ZKYcGAAZyki1IKQXgwWtq89R4mPBvA38J3
X-Orig-Path: transistor.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk!_news
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zAIFTs3t8VF4eI1V5qlzsut4NK8=
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit