Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #325Re: OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor?
From: keithr
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:12
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:12
41 lines
3249 bytes
3249 bytes
On 8/03/2012 9:28 PM, Nico Coesel wrote: > keithr<keith@nowhere.com.au> wrote: > >> On 8/03/2012 9:00 AM, Don McKenzie wrote: >>> OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor? >>> >>> After talks at the recent Embedded conference in Germany (2012), Olimex >>> decided to go ahead with the production of two new boards that were very >>> similar to the Rasberry Pi. The first one they should have prototypes in >>> the coming weeks. >>> >>> The second will be 3 to 6 months before production boards will be seen, >>> so I won't cover it in this report, however the CPU specs on this second >>> board, are almost identical to the RPi microcontroller chip, and board. >>> >>> Olimex describes this board as a bridge to the linux development >>> community and the Duinomite/Arduino/Maple/Pinguino world of developers. >>> >>> This will be completely Open Hardware / Open Source Project, all CAD >>> files will be available so everyone can download modify, and use them. >>> Same with the software. >>> >>> More Info: >>> http://www.duinomite.com/olinuxino-a-serious-rasberry-pi-competitor/ >> >> I suppose that it is the most sincere form of flattery. Looks like >> Olimex disagrees with all those on the other thread that reckon that the >> Pi is a waste of time. > > Maybe. But knowing Olimex they probably come up with a product that > actually appeals to people who like to build stuff. Less gadget, more > real world applications. I don't think there is a manufacturer of > embedded development boards with a wider variety. They must be doing > something right. > I think that people are missing the point with the Pi, it isn't intended as an embedded development board, it is a small cheap and fairly capable Linux system. From the specs so far, it looks the more capable of the two, but I'll leave judgement until I've seen both. Hopefully both will find their audience, but I'll try the Pi first.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4f58a221$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni2302pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!rahul.net!wasp.rahul.net!rahul.net!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<9rq432FqvmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f586c06$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <4f5888d6.3893170031@news.kpn.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 103407,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida5a6238865,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.227.166 with SMTP id sb6mr5146284pbc.4.1331208740657;
Thu, 08 Mar 2012 04:12:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:12:23 +1100
From: keithr <keith@nowhere.com.au>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor?
References: <9rq432FqvmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f586c06$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <4f5888d6.3893170031@news.kpn.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4f5888d6.3893170031@news.kpn.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.245.91.70
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.245.91.70
Message-ID: <4f58a221$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
X-Trace: dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au 1331208737 220.245.91.70 (8 Mar 2012 23:12:17 +1100)
Lines: 41
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni2302pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!rahul.net!wasp.rahul.net!rahul.net!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit