Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #330Re: OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor?
From: Nico Coesel
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:20
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:20
52 lines
3315 bytes
3315 bytes
keithr <keith@nowhere.com.au> wrote: >On 8/03/2012 12:10 PM, Don McKenzie wrote: >> On 08-Mar-12 11:51 AM, Nico Coesel wrote: >>> Don McKenzie<5V@2.5A> wrote: >>> >>>> On 08-Mar-12 10:23 AM, Paul wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hopefully also unlike rPI have mounting holes and a decent power >>>>> connector. >>>> >>>> http://www.olimex.com/about.html >>>> >>>> The company has over 20 yearsοΏ½ experience in designing, prototyping and >>>> manufacturing printed circuit boards, sub-assemblies, and complete >>>> electronic products. >>>> >>>> I doubt very much if you will see any of these problems Paul. :-) >>> >>> You never know. I've worked with designers with 20+ years of >>> experience who totally forget about mounting holes, forget about >>> clearance around screw heads or move holes on the next batch while >>> there are 100's of cases in stock with holes that match the 'old' >>> version. Did I already mention small 2mm / 78mil mounting holes? If it >>> where one project you might call it a mistake. On almost every project >>> its a real nuisance. >> >> I just had a look at the RPi videos, and they seem to have mounting >> holes and a DC power input plug. >> >> So I wonder what Paul was referring to. >> >> Cheers Don... > >I don't think that it has mounting holes, DC power is via a micro USB >connector. I see no mounting holes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Raspberry_Pi_Beta_Board.jpg It would be very nice if the Olimex board becomes something like this board: http://www.conitec.net/english/linuxboard.php The board by Conitec is just too expensive. I did look at it to build products around but the price was a showstopper. -- Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply indicates you are not using the right tools... nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) --------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4f58cd9e.3910778328@news.kpn.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni2817pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.euro.net!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!feed.xsnews.nl!ramfeed-1.ams.xsnews.nl!post-feeder-02.xsnews.nl!frontend-F10-13.ams.news.kpn.nlReferences:
<9rq432FqvmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f57e1e1.3850429078@news.kpn.nl> <9rq6pgFg3mU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.29c1fe3dc64abf34989704@172.16.0.1> <9rqardFd05U1@mid.individual.net> <4f580081.3858269265@news.kpn.nl> <9rqf87FadnU1@mid.individual.net> <4f586ae6$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 103407,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f849b,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid1617473143,gida5a6238865,gida2a404005f,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.201.129 with SMTP id ka1mr5552498pbc.6.1331220038678;
Thu, 08 Mar 2012 07:20:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni2817pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.euro.net!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!feed.xsnews.nl!ramfeed-1.ams.xsnews.nl!post-feeder-02.xsnews.nl!frontend-F10-13.ams.news.kpn.nl
From: nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor?
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:20:43 GMT
Message-ID: <4f58cd9e.3910778328@news.kpn.nl>
References: <9rq432FqvmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f57e1e1.3850429078@news.kpn.nl> <9rq6pgFg3mU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.29c1fe3dc64abf34989704@172.16.0.1> <9rqardFd05U1@mid.individual.net> <4f580081.3858269265@news.kpn.nl> <9rqf87FadnU1@mid.individual.net> <4f586ae6$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 52
Organization: KPN.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.147.3
X-Trace: 1331219998 news.kpn.nl 2638 213.10.147.3@kpn/213.10.147.3:2117