Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #334Re: OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor?
From: Nico Coesel
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:14
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:14
38 lines
3067 bytes
3067 bytes
hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> wrote: >On 3/8/2012 8:20 AM, Nico Coesel wrote: >> >> I see no mounting holes: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Raspberry_Pi_Beta_Board.jpg >> >> It would be very nice if the Olimex board becomes something like this >> board: >> http://www.conitec.net/english/linuxboard.php >> >> The board by Conitec is just too expensive. I did look at it to build >> products around but the price was a showstopper. >> >I wonder if Conitec had portrayed their board as a educational >non-profit board would they have had thousands of people clamoring to >buy one, and the price would have dropped to a reasonable level ?? Perhaps. But others boards are not really cheap either. However, the performance of the Conitec board is very poor. The same price will buy you a board with an 800MHz Cortex A8 CPU and 512MB of memory. It seems Conitec moved itself into the market of professional device programmers. Over a decade ago I bought one of their Galep programmers. Really nice but nowadays you can buy a Chinese programmer for 1/10th the price Conitec is charging. >Building 100 of anything is expensive, build 10,000 can get cheap in a >hurry. Exactly. Imagine being able to put something together on a piece of stripboard or a PCB you etch yourself and put some real processing horsepower into it for a small amount of money. -- Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply indicates you are not using the right tools... nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) --------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4f58d9a9.3913861343@news.kpn.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni2945pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!feed.xsnews.nl!ramfeed-1.ams.xsnews.nl!post-feeder-02.xsnews.nl!frontend-F09-03.ams.news.kpn.nlReferences:
<9rq432FqvmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f57e1e1.3850429078@news.kpn.nl> <9rq6pgFg3mU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.29c1fe3dc64abf34989704@172.16.0.1> <9rqardFd05U1@mid.individual.net> <4f580081.3858269265@news.kpn.nl> <9rqf87FadnU1@mid.individual.net> <4f586ae6$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <4f58cd9e.3910778328@news.kpn.nl> <jjal4e$1en$1@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 103407,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f849b,7c408bf4daf64026
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid1617473143,gida5a6238865,gida2a404005f,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.129.169 with SMTP id nx9mr5716697pbb.2.1331223293062;
Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:14:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni2945pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!feed.xsnews.nl!ramfeed-1.ams.xsnews.nl!post-feeder-02.xsnews.nl!frontend-F09-03.ams.news.kpn.nl
From: nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: OLinuXino, a serious Rasberry Pi competitor?
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:14:57 GMT
Message-ID: <4f58d9a9.3913861343@news.kpn.nl>
References: <9rq432FqvmU1@mid.individual.net> <4f57e1e1.3850429078@news.kpn.nl> <9rq6pgFg3mU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.29c1fe3dc64abf34989704@172.16.0.1> <9rqardFd05U1@mid.individual.net> <4f580081.3858269265@news.kpn.nl> <9rqf87FadnU1@mid.individual.net> <4f586ae6$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <4f58cd9e.3910778328@news.kpn.nl> <jjal4e$1en$1@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 38
Organization: KPN.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.147.3
X-Trace: 1331223232 news.kpn.nl 2645 213.10.147.3@kpn/213.10.147.3:2354