Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #610Re: OT: Big Bang Theory
From: Jon Kirwan
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:27
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:27
78 lines
4685 bytes
4685 bytes
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:00:56 +1100, "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> wrote: >Jon Kirwan wrote: >> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:28:08 +1100, "David L. Jones" >> <altzone@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Just finished watching Season 1 of Big Bang Theory, and have started >>> on Season 2. >>> Is it just me or is this the most hilarious and well written TV >>> comedy ever for nerds? >>> They have one engineer in the mix, but few engineering jokes, it's >>> mostly physics or geek gags. >>> But what a great value show. >>> If you haven't seen it, do yourself a favor and give it a go. >> >> Hi, Dave. I was pretty hopeful about Netflix'ing some of >> these after seeing a scene that was on Youtube, perhaps 6 >> months back. This scene is what caught my attention: >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A03gbr6oY0 >> >> They nailed the physicist/engineer thing nicely. And it >> played neatly into the fun I have with my son, joking about >> the differences between the work life of theoretical and >> experimental physicists, too! He and I found it putting that >> into a nice "box" to see. >> >> We got our first disk for the first season and I watched it >> with my wife. We found the laugh tracks annoying, the humor >> cheap, and the appeal mostly puerile ... broadly speaking. >> Bear in mind that I've only seen perhaps the first four or >> five shows, though. >> >> There are some good moments (when I can ignore the laugh >> tracks.) I'm _very_ glad to have watched that one scene. >> Most of it is difficult for me to wade through, though. >> >> If you know of some really good scenes to watch in the first >> season that you've already enjoyed (knowing that one which I >> considered 'nice'), I'd be interested in a pointer to the >> shows and perhaps the scenes within them. I would like >> looking at two-minute-at-a-time high points. I just can't >> wade through all the rest. > >Sorry, I'm not scene based, I find almost every line and manerism hilarious >in some way. The intricate story writing with it's blend of physics and nerd >manerisms is what makes it great overall, just not the odd science or nerd >joke scene. Well, I enjoy your videos. So we must have a few things in common. ;) But that show doesn't reach very high for its humor, mostly. Just my opinion. >> Maybe it is just because I can't stand the way they use the >> laugh tracks, though. It reminds me of the very first show >> to really use them (which went overboard), "The Real McCoys" >> back in the mid 1950's. That series had Walter Brennen and I >> liked him on other movies I'd watched before, but the whole >> show is simply unwatchable because of the laugh tracks. A >> person says "Hi" and a laugh track plays. Another says, >> "Well, I have to be going" and a laugh track plays. It >> doesn't matter what's said... it's almost continuous. >> Destroys the show for me when it is inanely flooded with >> laugh tracks. There's only so much I can stomach. > >It's a shame you can't just relax and look past that stuff, as the material >is just so brilliant. >I don't even notice the laugh tracks in the slightest, probably because I'm >laughing at the exact same points. Oh, the tracks are absolutely horrible. If nothing else did, their inane use of them alone would make me unable to watch much. I suppose that's parly why I find a scene wonderful but the show a pain I cannot handle. But I did try. I honestly tried. Jon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gcicm558o0opmgq1jl5oc57sfj9k8b61kv@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!188.40.43.213.MISMATCH!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<rab9n.25508$fu3.5411@newsfe12.iad> <5glam51c7514gbore6aj591qls00mr5dcf@4ax.com> <_Qo9n.44500$Np1.34087@newsfe19.iad>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: a5a6238865,44ee1f6550de3d15 X-Google-Attributes: gida5a6238865,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!188.40.43.213.MISMATCH!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jon Kirwan <jonk@infinitefactors.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics Subject: Re: OT: Big Bang Theory Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:27:44 -0800 Organization: Infinite Factors Lines: 78 Message-ID: <gcicm558o0opmgq1jl5oc57sfj9k8b61kv@4ax.com> References: <rab9n.25508$fu3.5411@newsfe12.iad> <5glam51c7514gbore6aj591qls00mr5dcf@4ax.com> <_Qo9n.44500$Np1.34087@newsfe19.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.motzarella.org; posting-host="jAj+9YfS8GGFdgWf5sYjJQ"; logging-data="27783"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bqAnGN5g9hS52xLVAsjWC" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171 Cancel-Lock: sha1:kFSWfKQkO8Bv4APR5CA/X7g+kas=