Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #770Re: Why don't they mark SMD caps?
From: Rich Webb
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:24
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:24
46 lines
3407 bytes
3407 bytes
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:50:51 GMT, Sergey Kubushin <ksi@koi8.net> wrote: >In sci.electronics.design Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever@infiniteseries.org> wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:06:12 +1000, "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>Archimedes' Lever wrote: >>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:58:49 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" >>>> <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Most of what we used were marked with a two character code. The >>>>> cheaper suppliers were unmarked. >>>> >>>> Wrong again. Markings fell out of vogue as part size decreased to >>>> the point where it was labor intensive to even examine the marking. >>> >>>Why do resistors of the same size still commonly have the markings then? >>>It's not about the size, we are talking 1206/0805 and other large sizes >>>here. >>>Markings on these size caps are not common (some would say rare), and it's >>>*always* been that way. >>>The question is why?... >>> >>>Dave. >> >> It maybe has "always been that way" with el cheapo brands, but I used >> to do pre-reflow inspection (post pick and place), and have loaded the >> cassettes into the picker placer, and have loaded the reels into the >> cassettes and have programmed the PCB into it... yada yada yada... >> >> I have seen a lot of caps that were marked, so you are either using >> cheap parts and always have, or your "always has" only amounts to a year >> or two, since they now seldom do it. > >Can you poin us at not-so-cheap marked SMD capacitors so I would always use >those in my projects? I don't care if they twice the price of those unmarked >cheap ones... Well, looking at some bog-standard 0805 0.1 uF 16V ceramic caps available from Digikey, only Kemet mentions even optional marking (as E noted above). No mention at all, that I saw, in the datasheets for Panasonic or Murata or Yageo or Johanson. Must be that those are all "el cheapo" brands, I suppose. -- Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<oiuj65dftv8h865fhgqcttprtleklohg8a@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<Z_S9m.29971$ZN.18539@newsfe23.iad> <4A687AA9.B2150AE@earthlink.net> <p21i65tclet22lj79iruabvufctrru9h9o@4ax.com> <Qy9am.55713$9P.28277@newsfe08.iad> <5eei651r9uovr8lo2avdvgr976es4fcvum@4ax.com> <%vmam.30516$vp.18936@newsfe12.iad>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: a5a6238865,26f718ada9b9cff2 X-Google-Attributes: gida5a6238865,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich Webb <bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics Subject: Re: Why don't they mark SMD caps? Organization: Line Eater Memorial Fund Message-ID: <oiuj65dftv8h865fhgqcttprtleklohg8a@4ax.com> References: <Z_S9m.29971$ZN.18539@newsfe23.iad> <4A687AA9.B2150AE@earthlink.net> <p21i65tclet22lj79iruabvufctrru9h9o@4ax.com> <Qy9am.55713$9P.28277@newsfe08.iad> <5eei651r9uovr8lo2avdvgr976es4fcvum@4ax.com> <%vmam.30516$vp.18936@newsfe12.iad> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Hamster-Pg/1.25.2.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090724-0, 07/24/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 46 X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly. Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:24:03 -0400