🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #787

Re: Why don't they mark SMD caps?

#787
From: krw
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:16
13 lines
1410 bytes
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:47:08 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
<OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:

>On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:58:49 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
><mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>   Most of what we used were marked with a two character code.  The
>>cheaper suppliers were unmarked.
>
>  Wrong again.  Markings fell out of vogue as part size decreased to the
>point where it was labor intensive to even examine the marking.

Then why are they still there on resistors of the same size, DimBulb?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3r2i65durdjmivltiifcjs4hkpf8eabcls@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <Z_S9m.29971$ZN.18539@newsfe23.iad> <4A687AA9.B2150AE@earthlink.net> <p21i65tclet22lj79iruabvufctrru9h9o@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: a5a6238865,26f718ada9b9cff2
X-Google-Attributes: gida5a6238865,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics
Subject: Re: Why don't they mark SMD caps?
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:16:44 -0500
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <3r2i65durdjmivltiifcjs4hkpf8eabcls@4ax.com>
References: <Z_S9m.29971$ZN.18539@newsfe23.iad> <4A687AA9.B2150AE@earthlink.net> <p21i65tclet22lj79iruabvufctrru9h9o@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net sJxY6qqnea07gfA6YECRpgJAhLsrxX2mmt6D1PwBPS+f1goTQE
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fe/ipdQozwWM3GoNqh8yGfxyRcE=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171