Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #853Re: Rigol caught with their pants down! (DS1052E Oscilloscope)
From: Martin Riddle
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:37
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:37
65 lines
3848 bytes
3848 bytes
"David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> wrote in message news:aAM8m.14055$8B7.9612@newsfe20.iad... > a7yvm109gf5d1@netzero.com wrote: >> On Jul 19, 7:04 am, "David L. Jones" <altz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> As promised, an expos� of an issue with the Rigol DS1052E >>> oscilloscope in my >>> latest video blog:http://www.alternatezone.com/eevblog/ >>> >>> Dave. >>> -- >>> --------------------------------------------- >>> Check out my Electronics Engineering Video Blog & >>> Podcast:http://www.alternatezone.com/eevblog/ >> >> You corrected the number of PLLs in the FPGA, how do they get the >> clocks' phases aligned? > > Beats me. > Could be as simple as fixed tuned gate delay inside the FPGA, or could > be some more complex system that auto-calibrates perhaps. > >> I'm no expert on digital scopes, but I suppose >> the clock frequency changes depending on the time base? > > Only when required when the memory is full. > On short memory mode (1GS/s, 16KB) a relay clicks in at 100ns/div and > it tells you it's doing 1GS/s on 50ns/div to 5ns/div. > No such click occurs when in long memory mode (500MS/s 1Mpoints), and > it stays on 500MS/s up to 100ns/div. > The relay is thus most likley switching the input signal between > either 5 or 10 ADC's depending upon the requirement. > >> Do they just drop some ADCs and keep the frequency, thereby >> permitting >> the use of trace delays to get the 100ps delays or what? >> Are the GS/s figures real time or equivalent time? > > 1GS/s real time of course, that's been the selling point of these > Rigol scopes for the last 5 years or so. > >> I think it is possible Rigol tests the ADCs and bins them in-house. >> Do >> you think they might run the power supply a bit "hotter" to get the >> parts to work at higher clocks? > > I don't think so, likely they have just done exhaustive testing of > these parts to ensure the work. Binning each one in house would be > possible, but messy. > Perhaps AD are the ones pulling the swifty and charging a huge premium > (almost 3 times) for the exact same part? > > Dave. > -- It could have been a purchasing error, that actually works. Or, the parts marked as 40 don�t meet the specs over temperature for a 100/80 mhz clock. Perhaps NL specs are not met but Rigol can compensate for the error. I've seen -40c to 85c parts work beyond the rated specs, with some additional error. Cheers
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<keN8m.359$MA3.202@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nwrddc02.gnilink.net.POSTED!c8dba710!not-for-mailReferences:
<9ZD8m.24080$Qg6.2130@newsfe14.iad> <07025c9a-509e-471b-b3a0-8965c4f191b8@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <aAM8m.14055$8B7.9612@newsfe20.iad>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: a5a6238865,22f414e979f56ad3 X-Google-Attributes: gida5a6238865,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nwrddc02.gnilink.net.POSTED!c8dba710!not-for-mail From: "Martin Riddle" <martin_rid@verizon.net> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics References: <9ZD8m.24080$Qg6.2130@newsfe14.iad> <07025c9a-509e-471b-b3a0-8965c4f191b8@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <aAM8m.14055$8B7.9612@newsfe20.iad> In-Reply-To: <aAM8m.14055$8B7.9612@newsfe20.iad> Subject: Re: Rigol caught with their pants down! (DS1052E Oscilloscope) Lines: 3 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8064.206 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8064.206 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090719-1, 07/19/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Message-ID: <keN8m.359$MA3.202@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:37:04 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.19.45.45 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrddc02.gnilink.net 1248043024 70.19.45.45 (Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:37:04 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:37:04 EDT