🚀 go-pugleaf

Ray wrote:
> blackhead <larryharson@softhome.net> wrote in
> news:0268880f-5658-44fe-8908-579f2f1031ba@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On 19 July, 23:02, "David L. Jones" <altz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do the scopes work?
>>>
>>> Yep, they work. So Rigol are obviously getting away with it by hook
>>> or by crook.
>>> If AD are deliberately under-speccing their normal chips, then it's
>>> a clever ploy by Rigol to exploit it.
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>> --
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>> Check out my Electronics Engineering Video Blog &
>>> Podcast:http://www.alternatezone.com/eevblog/
>>
>> So give it a 1 Ghz signal and see if it it looks right then.
>>
>
> Umm, no. Ever heard of Nyquist?
>
> Plus to see anything like a signal for your eye's benefit, you're
> better off with x10 sampling.
>
> So 100MHz is more on the mark. Does it allow you to simply plot the
> points without the "join the dots"?

Yep. You can choose between dots, linear ("join the dots") vector 
intepolation, or sinX/x interpolation.

> BTW if you had exactly 1GHz going in, and it manged to sneak pass the
> front end

That would be a neat trick!

Dave.

-- 
---------------------------------------------
Check out my Electronics Engineering Video Blog & Podcast:
http://www.alternatezone.com/eevblog/