🚀 go-pugleaf

Whilst licking their paws onSat, 19 May 2001 07:20:58 GMT,
hideo@tne.net.au (Adam) purred:

>On Sat, 19 May 2001 18:33:25 +1200, "Paul Bealing" <paul@pmb.co.nz>
>wrote:
>
>>They're probably mostly worried about the cell phone upsetting the petrol
>>pump controller causing it issue more petrol than it's charging you for.
>
>Ha ha... now that makes sense :-)
>
>How many times has a vending machine failed & gave you a free Coke?
>How many times has it failed & stolen your money?

There was a machine at my school that if you put in 1 dollar 40 cents
in 10 cent coins it gave you a free drink and 10 dollars.
>
>0/13?
>
>>
>>Aeroplanes are more of a worry. Is it sensible to fly at that altitude and
>>speed in a machine that can be disabled or loose its way because of a nearby
>>cell phone or lap-top computer.
>
>Actually, I was speaking of electronics outside of their "normal
>operating enclosures" eg. bare PC mobo's, peripheral cards & such. I
>would think Aircraft electronics would be well protected in flight,
>and possibly pre-tested against a wide spectrum of interference.
>
>>
>>--
>>Regards
>>Paul Bealing
>>PMB Electronics
>>www.pmb.co.nz


          ____
        /  @   \==]|[=(]
       |--------|
       ==========       .  *                                     
       ==========     .\ * . *.   *                         
      ||||||||||||      \ * ./  *    .   *    
     |||||||||| --]%%%%%% .- =--=---=-=-=-=-=
     [=========\  ]===========(  *                           
    [==============|   / *  \    .                          
    C| @ @ @ @ @ @ D         *      *                        
     |              \           .                          
   C| @  @ @  @ @ @  D       .
    |                 \          *                         
  C| @  @  @  @  @  @  D
   |                    \
 C| @  @  @   @   @   @  D
  |                       \
 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@|
  -------------------------