🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.misc
Article #59

Re: It's the RF that destroys the equipment

#59
From: John Larkin
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:54
36 lines
3050 bytes
On Fri, 18 May 2001 15:49:24 GMT, "Me" <tobtoh@hotmail.com> wrote:

>When I was doing my engineering degree, I was told the danger from mobile
>phones came from the electronic equipment picking up the RF (radio
>frequency) signals from the phone.
>
>Basically, a mobile phone minimises the amount of RF as much as possible.
>However, if you walk into a low reception area, it can boost the power of
>it's RF to greater levels to try and keep a good connection the base
>station.
>
>Now in electronic equipment, there are often small wires sticking up or
>short wire traces on the motherboard. When the mobile phone boosts it's RF
>power, these small wire stubs act as small atennae. The RF signal is picked
>up and transmitted along the electronic equipments circuit where it may end
>up 'entering' an electronic component. Electronic components, especially IC
>chips are designed to accept voltages/currents within certain tolerances. If
>they receive voltages/current outside these tolerances, that's when they can
>be damaged.
>
>Hence, the unexpected RF signal that comes down the circuit can damage the
>electronic component.
>
>What I have just said is something I read in an electronics magazine once -
>but I can't remember where or when.
>

As a practical matter, a cell phone emits puny amounts of power. While
you *might* temporarily disrupt the operation of a poorly-shielded
device (semiconductor junctions could rectify the RF and make DC
offsets in the millivolt range)  a cell phone doesn't have anything
like the energy density to kill a semiconductor. There are lots of far
more powerful RF sources around - ham radio, airport radars, AM/FM/TV
transmitters-  and they don't zap things.

John
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ZVEFO9gSFF7pZOoB9FFoXy=cdkUx@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
References: <3b04d952.4676022@news.tne.net.au> <8wbN6.60913$ff.476249@news-server.bigpond.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107cee,b39a96be9940783f
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cee,public
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,b39a96be9940783f
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d0a,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,b39a96be9940783f
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public
X-Google-Thread: 103407,b39a96be9940783f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public
X-Google-Thread: 1118be,b39a96be9940783f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1118be,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-18 09:51:23 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: John  Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandSNIP_THIStechnology.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.basics,aus.computers,aus.electronics
Subject: Re: It's the RF that destroys the equipment
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:54:05 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <ZVEFO9gSFF7pZOoB9FFoXy=cdkUx@4ax.com>
References: <3b04d952.4676022@news.tne.net.au> <8wbN6.60913$ff.476249@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.6/32.525
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Lines: 37