Article View: sci.electronics.misc
Article #59Re: It's the RF that destroys the equipment
From: John Larkin
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:54
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:54
36 lines
3050 bytes
3050 bytes
On Fri, 18 May 2001 15:49:24 GMT, "Me" <tobtoh@hotmail.com> wrote: >When I was doing my engineering degree, I was told the danger from mobile >phones came from the electronic equipment picking up the RF (radio >frequency) signals from the phone. > >Basically, a mobile phone minimises the amount of RF as much as possible. >However, if you walk into a low reception area, it can boost the power of >it's RF to greater levels to try and keep a good connection the base >station. > >Now in electronic equipment, there are often small wires sticking up or >short wire traces on the motherboard. When the mobile phone boosts it's RF >power, these small wire stubs act as small atennae. The RF signal is picked >up and transmitted along the electronic equipments circuit where it may end >up 'entering' an electronic component. Electronic components, especially IC >chips are designed to accept voltages/currents within certain tolerances. If >they receive voltages/current outside these tolerances, that's when they can >be damaged. > >Hence, the unexpected RF signal that comes down the circuit can damage the >electronic component. > >What I have just said is something I read in an electronics magazine once - >but I can't remember where or when. > As a practical matter, a cell phone emits puny amounts of power. While you *might* temporarily disrupt the operation of a poorly-shielded device (semiconductor junctions could rectify the RF and make DC offsets in the millivolt range) a cell phone doesn't have anything like the energy density to kill a semiconductor. There are lots of far more powerful RF sources around - ham radio, airport radars, AM/FM/TV transmitters- and they don't zap things. John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ZVEFO9gSFF7pZOoB9FFoXy=cdkUx@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3b04d952.4676022@news.tne.net.au> <8wbN6.60913$ff.476249@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107cee,b39a96be9940783f X-Google-Attributes: gid107cee,public X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,b39a96be9940783f X-Google-Attributes: gid111d0a,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,b39a96be9940783f X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,b39a96be9940783f X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-Thread: 1118be,b39a96be9940783f X-Google-Attributes: gid1118be,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-18 09:51:23 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandSNIP_THIStechnology.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.basics,aus.computers,aus.electronics Subject: Re: It's the RF that destroys the equipment Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:54:05 -0700 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <ZVEFO9gSFF7pZOoB9FFoXy=cdkUx@4ax.com> References: <3b04d952.4676022@news.tne.net.au> <8wbN6.60913$ff.476249@news-server.bigpond.net.au> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.6/32.525 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 37