🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.misc
Article #90

Re: Cable TV Descrambler - Never Pay for Premium Cable Again

#90
From: scott saunders
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00
28 lines
2644 bytes
In article <3130C878.29E9@bc.cybernex.net>, Steve Raft <sraft@bc.cybernex.net> says:
>
>George wrote:
>> 
>> SHNWGA wrote:
>> >
>> > Get caught and go to jail. Is it really worth it?
>> 
>> Humm... ok lets see in CA it is a misdemanor and max $1000 fine...
>> 
>> now they have to prove you actually watched something without paying for it right, hows that
>> going to happen?, mere possession is not illegal as if the cable company can own them so can you,
>> the law dosent allow one class of citizens a privlidge ofer another.
>> 
>> so we are back to actually catching you, humm are they going to peep through your window and
>> invade your privacy? get real, the only people that get in any real trouble are those that sell
>> them with the specific intent for you to do something illegal with them, not the user.
>
>
>A couple of the RF specialist/electrical engineers where I work have old me that tv's leak out 
>the signal that you are watching.  Theoretically the cable company could set up a sensitive 
>reciever in a van and go around neiborhoods tuning into these signals.  I don't know if this is 
>practical in real life or even if the cable companies really care about doing it.  I suspect that 
>if too large a percentage of cable subscibers obtain descramblers then the cable industry will 
>find a way to fight back.
   

  heard they've tried the van search but courts told them invasion of privacy
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4gu4sc$dff@news2.nkn.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4ffum9$st0@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4gg8o4$hdh@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <31308C80.5440@lgn.com> <3130C878.29E9@bc.cybernex.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4e7d,59743bbb5f600a0f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4e7d,public
X-Google-Thread: 1105d2,59743bbb5f600a0f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1105d2,public
X-Google-Thread: 1085ff,59743bbb5f600a0f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1085ff,public
X-Google-Thread: fb6d4,59743bbb5f600a0f
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb6d4,public
X-Google-Thread: 107cee,59743bbb5f600a0f
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cee,public
X-Google-Thread: fa7b4,59743bbb5f600a0f
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa7b4,public
X-Google-Thread: 111dad,59743bbb5f600a0f
X-Google-Attributes: gid111dad,public
X-Google-Thread: 1031e1,59743bbb5f600a0f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1031e1,public
From: vwragtop@fastlane.net (scott saunders)
Subject: Re: Cable TV Descrambler - Never Pay for Premium Cable Again
Date: 1996/02/27
Message-ID: <4gu4sc$dff@news2.nkn.net>
X-Deja-AN: 141284972
references: <4ffum9$st0@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4gg8o4$hdh@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <31308C80.5440@lgn.com> <3130C878.29E9@bc.cybernex.net>
organization: n/a
newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,ba.forsale,balt.forsale,ca.forsale,nj.forsale,ne.forsale,nv.forsale,pa.forsale,alt.cable-tv.re-regulate,alt.cellular,alt.