🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.repair
Article #461

Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: which?

#461
From: Yugo
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:18
41 lines
3406 bytes
After only 4 years, my Samsung 950p gave up (I bought it as an end of line 
model.) For no apparent reason, sometimes the sides wobble, and then, from 
the center towards top and bottom, the screen gets fuzzy. If I change 
screen resolution, it's OK. Then, it gets fuzzy and I must change 
resolution again. Etc. Samsung suggested that they maybe could fix the 
problem for close to the price of a new 19" CRT monitor. Without the 
guarantee, of course.

Sometimes the screen is absolutely perfect for an hour or two, so I doubt 
it's a big problem but, for a lack of service at a decent price on CRT 
monitors, it seems I'll have to scrap it, unless you can give me an idea 
of the problem. If it's apparently not a major problem, maybe I could get 
somebody to take a look. If not, I'll have to go for a LCD, though I'm 
less than enchanted by the technology.

I'm considering 2 LCD monitors. The one that best fits my needs -- 
writing, browsing the net, looking at pictures, DVDs (well, maybe one day) 
-- would be a LG L1952T, also sometimes refered to as L1952TX, apparently. 
300 cd/m2, contrast 1400:1, DVI-I (standard DVI, I suppose?), 8ms. Picture 
quality seems OK. Price: $289 CAN.

The Viewsonic VX922, is less bright (270 cd/m2), the contrast is not quite 
as good (700:1, if I remember well), but it's a 2ms, a monitor for gamers. 
  Accordingly, it's $50 more expensive: $339 CAN.

Salesman ALL tell me that I'd be much better off with the Viewsonic. They 
tell me that the Viewsonic quality is much better. The VX922 looks like a 
hot seller for Viewsonic, so maybe the price is set a bit lower than for 
other models.

A friend, who knows more about electronics than I, told me that, besides 
pixels dying, the main problem with LCDs is screen fade out. So, unless 
Viewsonic's pretention that their light source has a 40,000 hrs long life 
(other models have a 50,000 hour life expectancy, though) I suppose I'd 
theoretically be better off with the LG.

But I'm not a gamer and never will be. My feeling with LG support is not 
very good: they don't even have an 800 number for support!

What is your experience with both Viewsonic and LG? Which monitor would 
you go for?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <128ma428c1mma3c@corp.supernews.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.germany.com!feed.xsnews.nl!feeder.xsnews.nl!sn-ams-06!sn-xt-ams-08!sn-ams!sn-feed-ams-01!sn-post-ams-02!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1131b0,baf9998353540ccc,start
X-Google-Thread: 103407,baf9998353540ccc,start
X-Google-Thread: 114b03,baf9998353540ccc,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1131b0,gid103407,gid114b03,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.germany.com!feed.xsnews.nl!feeder.xsnews.nl!sn-ams-06!sn-xt-ams-08!sn-ams!sn-feed-ams-01!sn-post-ams-02!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Yugo <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair,aus.electronics,alt.electronics.analog.vlsi
Subject: Weird problem with Samsung 950p monitor; LG or Niewsonic: which?
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:18:12 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <128ma428c1mma3c@corp.supernews.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20040809
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 42