🚀 go-pugleaf

The common cause in your CRT monitor is that many of the electrolytic 
capacitors become temperature sensitive with age and use. The cost of 
servicing your monitor would most likely exceed the replacement value. This 
is not a repair you can easily do yourself, unless you are experienced in 
servicing monitors.

Much of what you are going on about the life span of LCD monitors is a lot 
of hype!  Get yourself a good LCD monitor, and you will be very happy with 
it. I would never go back to the CRT type again. In a way I have no choice, 
because in about a year, there will be no more available, unless bought 
used.

The Viewsonic, and Sony in their higher end models are excellent. I have a 
number of Viewsonics, and I am very pleased with them.

-- 

JANA
_____


"Yugo" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message 
news:128ma428c1mma3c@corp.supernews.com...
After only 4 years, my Samsung 950p gave up (I bought it as an end of line
model.) For no apparent reason, sometimes the sides wobble, and then, from
the center towards top and bottom, the screen gets fuzzy. If I change
screen resolution, it's OK. Then, it gets fuzzy and I must change
resolution again. Etc. Samsung suggested that they maybe could fix the
problem for close to the price of a new 19" CRT monitor. Without the
guarantee, of course.

Sometimes the screen is absolutely perfect for an hour or two, so I doubt
it's a big problem but, for a lack of service at a decent price on CRT
monitors, it seems I'll have to scrap it, unless you can give me an idea
of the problem. If it's apparently not a major problem, maybe I could get
somebody to take a look. If not, I'll have to go for a LCD, though I'm
less than enchanted by the technology.

I'm considering 2 LCD monitors. The one that best fits my needs -- 
writing, browsing the net, looking at pictures, DVDs (well, maybe one day)
-- would be a LG L1952T, also sometimes refered to as L1952TX, apparently.
300 cd/m2, contrast 1400:1, DVI-I (standard DVI, I suppose?), 8ms. Picture
quality seems OK. Price: $289 CAN.

The Viewsonic VX922, is less bright (270 cd/m2), the contrast is not quite
as good (700:1, if I remember well), but it's a 2ms, a monitor for gamers.
  Accordingly, it's $50 more expensive: $339 CAN.

Salesman ALL tell me that I'd be much better off with the Viewsonic. They
tell me that the Viewsonic quality is much better. The VX922 looks like a
hot seller for Viewsonic, so maybe the price is set a bit lower than for
other models.

A friend, who knows more about electronics than I, told me that, besides
pixels dying, the main problem with LCDs is screen fade out. So, unless
Viewsonic's pretention that their light source has a 40,000 hrs long life
(other models have a 50,000 hour life expectancy, though) I suppose I'd
theoretically be better off with the LG.

But I'm not a gamer and never will be. My feeling with LG support is not
very good: they don't even have an 800 number for support!

What is your experience with both Viewsonic and LG? Which monitor would
you go for?