Article View: sci.electronics
Article #10002Re: Wire-wrap tools
From: John Purbrick
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 1991 05:44
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 1991 05:44
16 lines
1325 bytes
1325 bytes
I've used the Gardner-Denver tools a lot, and they're good. I wouldn't be too dogmatic about battery versus plug-in; the tradeoff is a trailing cord versus a heavy tool (2 D cells in the handle). The AC models are a lot lighter. I agree that pre-stripped wire ends up being a nuisance more than a benefit. The Vector "Slit-n-Wrap" tool has some merits but not enough, IMHO, to beat a more conventional tool. It can do daisy chaining, and it's good for a whole row of grounds on adjacent pins for example, but the wire it uses has a thick soft insulation and ends up looking (and being) crowded. It also breaks wires occasionally and recovering from this is a major pain. To trim off the end of a run requires reaching down between the pins with clippers or leaving a flying end, both undesirable results. John Purbrick jpexg@ai.mit.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13248@life.ai.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!rice-chex!jpexgReferences:
<21041@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1991Feb7.221900.16101@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!rice-chex!jpexg From: jpexg@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu (John Purbrick) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Wire-wrap tools Message-ID: <13248@life.ai.mit.edu> Date: 8 Feb 91 05:44:37 GMT References: <21041@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1991Feb7.221900.16101@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Sender: news@ai.mit.edu Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Lines: 16