Article View: sci.electronics
Article #10030Re: Low frequency tuned circuit
From: BACS Data Communications Group
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 1991 16:39
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 1991 16:39
60 lines
3091 bytes
3091 bytes
John Whitmore writes: >In article <11780@pt.cs.cmu.edu> cline@PROOF.ERGO.CS.CMU.EDU (Kenneth >Cline) writes: >>I am building a class-C amplifier for 2275 hz (yes - audio frequency), >>as shown in the schematic below: >> V+ >> | >> +---+---+ >> 3 | >> 3 | >> +--+--|<---3 - >> +-+ | | 3 _ >> | | |-+ _ 3 | >> | | Signal In ----|<+ ^ 3 | >> | | |-+ | 3 | >> ---+ +----------- +--+ +-------+ >> | >> ----- >> --- >> - Sorry I missed the original posting. 25% duty cycle works well, and is easy to achieve with flipflops and gates. Try a separate primary winding instead of a tap on the main coil; it's much easier to adjust the number of turns for optimum performance. BTW, coupling affects resonance. An air-core coil will probably work better than ferrite unless there are serious size constraints. The permeability gain of ferrite is only effective if the core is much longer than the coil. Ferrite will change the coil's inductance with temperature. For reasonable values of Q at audio frequencies, bandwidth becomes _very_ narrow, so it's necessary to have stable components. You may have to select the tuning capacitor form a whole box of like-valued capacitors. I have achieved best Q with high-voltage mica capacitors. Signal strength of near-field-induction devices such as avalanche transceivers and cave radios is proportional to the inverse _cube_ of the range: To double the range requires a 64-times power increase. Effort is better spent in a sophisticated receiver than in a powerful transmitter. Range is proportional the _magnetic moment_ of the transmitting coil. Magnetic moment is the product of current, number of turns, and _area_ within the coil. The best way to extend range is to use the largest practicable coil diameter. The optimum "antenna" is all your wire in a single huge turn. The inductance and Q of a single large turn are very low; such a coil needs no tuning at audio frequencies. Reference: _73_ magazine, February 1984, p. 42. -- Frank Reid reid@ucs.indiana.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Feb9.163914.9596@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!commgrp@silver.ucs.indiana.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!commgrp@silver.ucs.indiana.edu From: commgrp@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (BACS Data Communications Group) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Low frequency tuned circuit Message-ID: <1991Feb9.163914.9596@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> Date: 9 Feb 91 16:39:14 GMT Sender: daemon@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Mr Background) Organization: Indiana University Lines: 60