Article View: sci.electronics
Article #10526Re: A question about the Nyquist theorm
From: Joe Buck
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1991 18:09
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1991 18:09
17 lines
1426 bytes
1426 bytes
In article <1180@aviary.Stars.Reston.Unisys.COM>, gaby@Stars.Reston.Unisys.COM ( UNISYS) writes:
|> I think the oversampling is not time interpolation (which by Nyquist
|> does not add any more information to the originial signal), but more
|> error correction oversampling. I.e. the same bit is sampled multiple
|> times to determine its value. I assume that this is done by sampling
|> over the duration (space on the CD) of the bit.
When you don't know what you're talking about, please save the
network bandwidth by refraining from posting. You clearly haven't
a clue about the way error correction is done on CDs (it's done
by error correcting codes) and your phrasing ("I think", "I assume")
indicates that you're making it up.
--
Joe Buck
jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu {uunet,ucbvax}!galileo.berkeley.edu!jbuck
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11729@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!pasteur!galileo.berkeley.edu!jbuckReferences:
<20408@shlump.nac.dec.com> <625@ctycal.UUCP> <11515@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <wilf.667759065@rigel.sce.carleton.ca> <1180@aviary.Stars.Reston.Unisys.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!pasteur!galileo.berkeley.edu!jbuck From: jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,comp.dsp Subject: Re: A question about the Nyquist theorm Message-ID: <11729@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 6 Mar 91 18:09:01 GMT References: <20408@shlump.nac.dec.com> <625@ctycal.UUCP> <11515@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <wilf.667759065@rigel.sce.carleton.ca> <1180@aviary.Stars.Reston.Unisys.COM> Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU Reply-To: jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) Lines: 17