🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <BxnGI5.FD5@uunet.uu.net> sehari@iastate.edu (Babak Sehari) writes:
>In observation of the guidelines for usenet group creation a request for
>discussion on creation of sci.solid-state.electronics is being
>cross posted to sci.electronics, sci.physics, and news.announce.newsgroups.
>The name of this group is still open for discussion. Each field of this 
>new proposed newsgroup name should be less than 15 characters long, a field 
>is the combinations of words between two ".". Also, there should be no bogus 
>character such as "&" in the field.
>
>This new newsgroup, which is **not** to be moderated, is to focus on various
>areas of microelectronics, solid states, semiconductors, semiconductor
>devices, lithography, quantum electronics, semiconductor processing
>(such as CVD, MBE, etc...), different IC technologies (such as VLSI,
>ULSI, WSI, 3DI etc..) , digital, AF, RF, MMIC technologies, optical
>components (such as LED, LCD, Lasers), optical fibers and ...
>
>Please, post your support for creation of this newsgroup and any comments
>you might have about this newsgroup to sci.electronics and/or sci.physics.
>
>                     With highest regards,
>                          Babak   Sehari.

I support the creation of this group, but why not just call it
sci.microelectronics since it will focus on 'various areas of
microelectronics'.  Or even sci.microstructural.electronics.

Walter A. Wohlmuth
Tri-University Meson Facility (TRIUMF)
Microelectronics Lab