Article View: sci.electronics
Article #14286Re: NiCd behavior
From: Andrew Zimmerman
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1991 09:24
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1991 09:24
43 lines
2563 bytes
2563 bytes
In article <1991Jun16.215158.27005@athena.cs.uga.edu> mcovingt@athena.cs.uga.edu (Michael A. Covington) writes: >In article <6666@qip.UUCP> john@qip.UUCP (John Moore) writes: >>In article <1991Jun16.041527.3366@netcom.COM> fiedler@netcom.COM (David Fiedler) writes: >>]mcovingt@athena.cs.uga.edu (Michael A. Covington) writes: >>] >>]>Full discharge for a 7.2-V NiCd is about 6 volts. Taking it below 6 volts >>]>can damage it by causing some of the cells to become reverse-charged. >>] >>]What *he* said. I believe the target voltage for discharging is .9 to 1.0 >>]volts per cell. Find the number of cells in any NiCd battery by dividing >>]by the NiCd cell voltage, 1.2. You don't want to go lower than 5.4 (better >>]luck next time :-). >> >>Better yet, don't discharge it at all. The most recent Gates application >>notes show that there is NO appreciable memory effect in modern NiCads - >>they ran a lot of experiments. Thus, there is NO REASON TO DISCHARGE NICADS! >>-- > >Not only that, but an article in Electronics World (London) says that >a fast charge is better than a slow charge because it forms smaller (and >more mixed-up) crystals. They advocate charging very fast (even 1-hour >charge) if the temperature of the cell is monitored. > >Hmmm, anyone for a fast charger that you put into the refrigerator? >Or one with a thermoelectric cooler? > 1 hour to charge a battery, thats not a fast charge :-) I do 15-20 minute charges. (Oh course, that is for quick discharge NiCd's.) Truthfully, I abuse my NiCd's. I always charge them in 15 minutes, and I even charge them when they're hot. I have never had a problem with NiCd memory. I do try to discharge them completely, but I don't go to the extreme of hooking resistors or light bulbs to them. The above is just my personal experience. I am not saying that you should do quick charges, or that NiCd's don't have memory. Andrew zimmer@calvin.stanford.edu ---- My other car is radio controlled.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun17.092406.11386@neon.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!calvin!zimmerReferences:
<1991Jun16.041527.3366@netcom.COM> <6666@qip.UUCP> <1991Jun16.215158.27005@athena.cs.uga.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!calvin!zimmer From: zimmer@calvin.stanford.edu (Andrew Zimmerman) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: NiCd behavior Message-ID: <1991Jun17.092406.11386@neon.Stanford.EDU> Date: 17 Jun 91 09:24:06 GMT References: <1991Jun16.041527.3366@netcom.COM> <6666@qip.UUCP> <1991Jun16.215158.27005@athena.cs.uga.edu> Sender: news@neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System) Organization: Stanford University Lines: 43