Re: 8051 -vs- 68HC11 ... summary ???

Article View: sci.electronics

Article #14458

#14458

From: Sakari Aaltonen
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 17:06

15 lines
1405 bytes

In article <1992Dec9.124426.27299@ms.uky.edu> billq@ms.uky.edu (Billy Quinn) writes:
>I am wanting to gather info from users/developers regarding the main
>differences between 8051's and 68HC11's.  Also I am looking for a 
>sort of a 'favorite chip' vote.
>...........................................

IMHO, there are so many models/variants of both basic architectures made
that a _general_ comparison is almost impossible. Which model of the 8051
should be compared with which model of the 68HC11? There may be thousands
of permutations...
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sakari Aaltonen                                 Email: sakaria@vipunen.hut.fi
"Unlike Gnu, a public-domain Unix look-alike system, MINIX is not vaporware."
                - Allen I.Holub, Dr.Dobb's, Jan '88 -

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec11.170629.14384@nntp.hut.fi>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!funic!nntp.hut.fi!vipunen.hut.fi!sakaria

References: <1992Dec9.124426.27299@ms.uky.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!funic!nntp.hut.fi!vipunen.hut.fi!sakaria
From: sakaria@vipunen.hut.fi (Sakari Aaltonen)
Subject: Re: 8051 -vs- 68HC11 ... summary ???
Message-ID: <1992Dec11.170629.14384@nntp.hut.fi>
Keywords: 8051
Sender: usenet@nntp.hut.fi (Usenet pseudouser id)
Nntp-Posting-Host: vipunen.hut.fi
Reply-To: sakaria@vipunen.hut.fi (Sakari Aaltonen)
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology
References: <1992Dec9.124426.27299@ms.uky.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 17:06:29 GMT
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message