Article View: sci.electronics
Article #14496Re: Best nicads??
From: Michael Schuster
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 13:10
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 13:10
22 lines
1555 bytes
1555 bytes
In article <rich.724149537@pencil> rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu (Rich Winkel) writes: >In <1992Dec10.083347.10926@hemlock.cray.com> n3022@cray.com (Jim Knoll) writes: >>Can someone tell me if there is a possible FAQ that rates the >>different manufacturers of nicad batteries according to quality, >>power output, etc.? > >Consumer Reports ran an article on batteries about a year ago, I think >it was nov 91. They tested standard, alkaline and nicad batteries. >I seem to recall radio shack (gasp) had among the best nicads, especially >in the D size, which were something like twice the capacity of all other >D sized nicads. The reason is that other brands' D nicads were actually >C sized nicads camouflaged in D cases. >Well worth reading. Are you sure the Radio Shack endorsement didn't just apply to their alkaline cells? The Radio Shack D nicads are =AA= cells in D cases! -- _______________________________Mike Schuster________________________________ NY Pub. Access UNIX/Internet: schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM The Portal (R) System: schuster@shell.portal.com | MCI Mail,GEnie: MSCHUSTER
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec12.131021.19612@panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!news.ans.net!cmcl2!panix!schusterReferences:
<1992Dec10.083347.10926@hemlock.cray.com> <rich.724149537@pencil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!news.ans.net!cmcl2!panix!schuster From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster) Subject: Re: Best nicads?? Message-ID: <1992Dec12.131021.19612@panix.com> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 13:10:21 GMT References: <1992Dec10.083347.10926@hemlock.cray.com> <rich.724149537@pencil> Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC Keywords: nicad Lines: 22