Article View: sci.electronics
Article #14556Lamp intensity vs. lifetime (was Re: 486 CPU KOOLERS FOR SALE)
From: Markus Wandel
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:41
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:41
39 lines
2619 bytes
2619 bytes
In article <Bx93z4.n2B@cs.dal.ca> legrady@ug.cs.dal.ca (Tom Legrady) writes: > >I don't know about the exact relationship of heat and lifetime for >electronics comnponents, but there is an inverse exponential effect on >the life of high-intensity lamps, such as the ones used for stage >lighting. I have to fudge the exact numbers, since I've been out of >theatre for a number of years, but dropping a lamp to 90% full >intensity generally doubles the expected life of a lamp. Dropping to >80% results in an unlimited expected life. Since our reaction to light >is non-linear, dropping to 90% has little effect on preceived >brightness. Since the lamps used cost $30 - $50 or more apiece and >have an expected life ranging from 300 - 2000 hours, doubling the life >is a desirable things to do. Of course, if you drop it, it still dies. What about photographic floodlights? These things have expected lifetimes of just 2-8 hours. I thought if I ever use the lamps and bulbs that I have I would build a control box that allows the lamps to be dimmed until the moment they are needed (for a still photo), then increased to full intensity, then dimmed again. That would save on heat, lamp lifetime, power consumption, etc. Several ways to dim a lamp come to mind: 1. Two identical ones in series 2. Diode in series (halfwave rectification) 3. Electronic dimmer. But there are a couple of things I am not sure about. Lamp dimmers cause light bulbs to buzz, surely not a good thing for a fragile, overheated filament you are trying to extend the life of. The diode approach also messes with the AC waveform. Two in series sounds pretty good, but when I switch over, the lamps will be briefly off, then fired up to full intensity. Would this switching transient and associated rapid heating or cooling of the filament be just as bad for the bulb as leaving it on high intensity in the first place? I'm guessing this because most bulbs I've seen burn out did so when turned on. Anyone have any experience in this? Markus Wandel markus@pinetree.org <-- NOT the source of this posting
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov16.164101.20150@bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!nott!bnrgate!bcars267!mwandelReferences:
<1992Nov05.024950.15606@kksys.com> <Bx8CA2.GF2@ns1.nodak.edu> <Bx93z4.n2B@cs.dal.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.photo Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!nott!bnrgate!bcars267!mwandel From: mwandel@bnr.ca (Markus Wandel) Subject: Lamp intensity vs. lifetime (was Re: 486 CPU KOOLERS FOR SALE) Message-ID: <1992Nov16.164101.20150@bnr.ca> Sender: news@bnr.ca (usenet) Nntp-Posting-Host: bcara187 Organization: bnr References: <1992Nov05.024950.15606@kksys.com> <Bx8CA2.GF2@ns1.nodak.edu> <Bx93z4.n2B@cs.dal.ca> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:41:01 GMT Lines: 39