🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #14657

Re: Lamp intensity vs. lifetime (was Re: 486 CPU KOOLERS FOR SALE)

#14657
From: Phil Ngai
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:07
9 lines
839 bytes
In article <1992Nov16.164101.20150@bnr.ca> mwandel@bnr.ca (Markus Wandel) writes:
>What about photographic floodlights?  These things have expected lifetimes
>of just 2-8 hours.  I thought if I ever use the lamps and bulbs that I have

Why would you want to use those when you can now get 1.5 kilowatt
halogen floodlights?

-- 
My opinions are my own.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Nov17.210740.1216@adobe.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!decwrl!adobe!pngai
References: <Bx8CA2.GF2@ns1.nodak.edu> <Bx93z4.n2B@cs.dal.ca> <1992Nov16.164101.20150@bnr.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.photo
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!decwrl!adobe!pngai
From: pngai@adobe.com (Phil Ngai)
Subject: Re: Lamp intensity vs. lifetime (was Re: 486 CPU KOOLERS FOR SALE)
Message-ID: <1992Nov17.210740.1216@adobe.com>
Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS)
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated
References: <Bx8CA2.GF2@ns1.nodak.edu> <Bx93z4.n2B@cs.dal.ca> <1992Nov16.164101.20150@bnr.ca>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:07:40 GMT
Lines: 9