Article View: sci.electronics
Article #14831Re: Best nicads??
From: Adrian Hurt
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:58
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:58
50 lines
2471 bytes
2471 bytes
In article <1992Dec15.161824.7507@cc.gatech.edu> byron@cc.gatech.edu (Byron A Jeff) writes: > >I don't think that's the version referred to. RS has a line of high capacity >NiCads (from memory of the 1993 catalog): > >Size: Amp Hours >----- --------- >D 4.3 >C 2.0 >AA 1.6 (I think) For what it's worth, here are the capacities of Ever Ready NiCad batteries in my Oct 1992 - Mar 1993 Farnell catalogue (Farnell being a mail order firm, not a producer): Size Amp Hours ---- --------- AAA 0.18 N 0.15 AA 0.50 C 2.20 D 4.00 PP3 0.11 PP9 1.20 RS, which in this country stands for Radio Spares, sell special high capacity batteries made by Varta. Most are odd sizes, but there is an AA battery with a figure of 0.70 Ah. Note that unlike what some people have claimed, those PP3 and PP9 batteries put out 8.4V, not just 7.2V. If that figure of 1.6 Ah for an AA battery is correct, I want an address so I can order some! As for the person who wanted to detect how full a battery is by the voltage it produces, the Farnell catalogue has a graph showing capacity versus voltage. The graph starts out at 1.4V, drops sharply to about 1.25V at 10% discharge, stays fairly flat with a slight downward slope to about 1.2V at 75% discharge, and then drops more sharply again. In fact, there are three curves shown, for different currents - using a higher current results in a slightly lower capacity. All three curves are the same shape, though - sharp drop, very flat for most of the battery's discharge time, then another sharpish drop at the end. So you should be able to tell when a battery is really freshly charged, and when it is really low, but you will have a hard time telling whether it is 30% discharged or 60% discharged. -- "Keyboard? How quaint!" - M. Scott Adrian Hurt | JANET: adrian@uk.ac.hw.cee UUCP: ..!uknet!cee.hw.ac.uk!adrian | ARPA: adrian@cee.hw.ac.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec21.155812.18359@cs.hw.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!edcastle!hwcs!adrianReferences:
<1992Dec12.131021.19612@panix.com> <13635@optilink.COM> <1992Dec15.161824.7507@cc.gatech.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!edcastle!hwcs!adrian From: adrian@cs.hw.ac.uk (Adrian Hurt) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Best nicads?? Message-ID: <1992Dec21.155812.18359@cs.hw.ac.uk> Date: 21 Dec 92 15:58:12 GMT References: <1992Dec12.131021.19612@panix.com> <13635@optilink.COM> <1992Dec15.161824.7507@cc.gatech.edu> Sender: news@cs.hw.ac.uk (News Administrator) Organization: Dept of Computing & Electrical Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Scotland Lines: 50