Article View: sci.electronics
Article #15433Re: Basic bench equipment query
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 04:18
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 04:18
17 lines
1440 bytes
1440 bytes
In article <2B3582F9.18867@news.service.uci.edu> gkwan@balboa.eng.uci.edu (Greg Kwan) writes:
>1. Get the best DMM you can--it's the most important test instrument.
>I have a Fluke 77 and have been very happy with it, but would probably
>go for an 87 or 79 now. You'll probably use the freq. counter since
>it's a pain to fire up the scope just to measure a frequency...
Note, though, that any frequency measurement using something other than
a scope relies heavily on assumptions about waveform. When I first got
my current scope, I hoked up a little audio-frequency square-wave generator
with a 555 as an independent test signal. I was a bit surprised to find
that my frequency counter read twice what the scope showed me. Turned
out that the leading edge was sloppy enough to double-trigger my rather
sensitive frequency counter. There is no substitute for seeing exactly
what's happening.
--
"God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
-Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzwHA7.6y@zoo.toronto.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!utzoo!henryReferences:
<BzB8rD.BDp@hfglobe.intel.com> <2B3582F9.18867@news.service.uci.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!utzoo!henry From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Basic bench equipment query Message-ID: <BzwHA7.6y@zoo.toronto.edu> Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 04:18:05 GMT References: <BzB8rD.BDp@hfglobe.intel.com> <2B3582F9.18867@news.service.uci.edu> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 17