Article View: sci.electronics
Article #15618Re: Flywheel batteries as EV power source
From: dave pierson
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 08:32
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 08:32
46 lines
2878 bytes
2878 bytes
In article <30DEC199200153934@pierre.mit.edu>, chuck@pierre.mit.edu (Chuck Parsons) writes, in part: > People have been considering this problem from the standpoint of >how much energy a gas powered car uses and missing a few points. > > First a car engin is only about 25% efficient under good running conditions. >electric systems can be 95% efficient. 75% efficient should be redily >obtainable so divide gasoline_energy by three. uhmmmmm. The 25% figure is FUEL IN to SHAFT HP OUT. The commonly quoted figure for a combustion engine (VWs had 25 HP, Corvettes had 300-400HP, etc, is SHAFT HP OUT) (I am NOT getting into losses is gearing, tire friction, etc.) So the comparision of 25 HP electric to 25 HP gasoline is correct, no 75% derating applies. The "only uses 25HP" we have seen going by over the past few days is _also_ valid, since the usual design approach leaves a substantial reserve between _average_ load and _peak_ available HP, for passing, etc. Electric motors have a small advanatage, as they have, control gear permitting, substantial short time overload capacity. I reccomend "The Electrical Engineers Handbook", the one I have is Fink & Beatty, McGraw-Hill. Handy graph of energy densities for various systems: NiCd peaks at 40WH/KG Lead Acid at 50WH/KG NaS at 400WH/KG Combustion engines over 4000WH/KG Similar figures for a flywheel system should be available from proponents. To each must be added containment figures. (At the risk of restarting the flame war, consider the collision risks of NaS... A battery, tho, has an advantage ofver a flywheel: since the storage is chemical/potential, rather than kinetic, once the battery has disassembled the release of the stored energy stops. One then has lots of lead (perhaps) or sulphuric acid or maybe 500C mix of Na and S lying about the street.) thanks dave pierson |the facts, as accurately as i can manage, Digital Equipment Corporation |the opinions, my own. 40 Old Bolton Rd |I am the NRA. Stow, Mass, USA 01775 pierson@msd26.enet.dec.com "He has read everything, and, to his credit, written nothing." A J Raffles
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec30.134630.28643@ryn.mro4.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!ryn.mro4.dec.com!empror.enet.dec.com!piersonReferences:
<1992Dec15.194558.2556@adobe.com> <1992Dec16.192456.6261@news.cs.brandeis.edu> <1goebdINNik@gap.caltech.edu> <77750@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> <30DEC199200153934@pierre.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,sci.energy,rec.autos.tech Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!ryn.mro4.dec.com!empror.enet.dec.com!pierson From: pierson@empror.enet.dec.com (dave pierson) Subject: Re: Flywheel batteries as EV power source Message-ID: <1992Dec30.134630.28643@ryn.mro4.dec.com> Sender: news@ryn.mro4.dec.com (USENET News System) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation References: <1992Dec15.194558.2556@adobe.com> <1992Dec16.192456.6261@news.cs.brandeis.edu> <1goebdINNik@gap.caltech.edu> <77750@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> <30DEC199200153934@pierre.mit.edu> Date: 30 DEC 92 08:32:57 Lines: 46