Article View: sci.electronics
Article #15670Re: Flywheel batteries as EV power source
From: Dave Pierson
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:26
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:26
41 lines
2978 bytes
2978 bytes
In article <1992Dec17.011649.987@cmkrnl.com>, jeh@cmkrnl.com writes, in part: >The flywheel is a great way to store mechanical energy. However I'm not >certain about the means for using it. Somehow the energy must be gotten >outside of the container. Indeed. Modern technologies of inverters and induction motors will make it a LOT easier. The RR suppliers (more in Europe than in the US) routinely build KW, "four quadrant" (bidirectional) inverters up to 500 KW or so, with good enough efficiency to replace relays in control gear. The difference is they have a locomotive to move them around on. >Then we come to electric motors to drive the wheels. Electric motors have >wonderful torque/speed characteristics for vehicles (they generate maximum >torque just before stall speed, which may make transmissions and clutches >unnecessary) but lousy power density -- look at the size of a 1-hp. electric >motor sometime and tell me how big a motor would have to be to accelerate a >car fast enough to keep up with gasoline-powered ones. urmmmmm. Compare, sometime, the size of a 500HP traction motor (found in sets of four or six) UNDER a locomotive. Not that dissimilar to a 500 hp gasoline engine. And Electric motors have short term overload characteristics to deliver, briefly, large amounts of power above the steady state (Large: ~10X for minutes, ~double for ~hour.) If the batteries are ready, the motors will be. And modern control systems will allow use of the overload capacity without impacting the long term reliability of the motor. "consumer size" electric motors (say up to 1 hp) are on a very different part of the HP/Volume/Weight space than those for _serious_ power. I believe the key to (autonomous) electric vehicles is still the storage. I have not got numbers here, but best batteries are still (roughly) 10x weight and/or volume over gasoline in weight/energy. Flywheels are better, but not, i think, more than 2x better. thanks dave pierson |the facts, as accurately as i can manage, Digital Equipment Corporation |the opinions, my own. 40 Old Bolton Rd |I am the NRA. Stow, Mass 01775 USA pierson@msd26.enet.dec.com "He has read everything, and, to his credit, written nothing." A J Raffles
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec17.134029.18900@ryn.mro4.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!olivea!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!ryn.mro4.dec.com!ggone.enet.dec.com!piersonReferences:
<1992Dec13.114534.961@cmkrnl.com> <1992Dec15.004956.465@mtu.edu> <1992Dec15.194558.2556@adobe.com> <1992Dec16.192456.6261@news.cs.brandeis.edu> <1992Dec17.011649.987@cmkrnl.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!olivea!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!ryn.mro4.dec.com!ggone.enet.dec.com!pierson From: pierson@ggone.enet.dec.com (Dave Pierson) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,sci.energy,rec.autos.tech Subject: Re: Flywheel batteries as EV power source Message-ID: <1992Dec17.134029.18900@ryn.mro4.dec.com> Date: 17 Dec 92 16:26:17 GMT References: <1992Dec13.114534.961@cmkrnl.com> <1992Dec15.004956.465@mtu.edu> <1992Dec15.194558.2556@adobe.com> <1992Dec16.192456.6261@news.cs.brandeis.edu> <1992Dec17.011649.987@cmkrnl.com> Sender: news@ryn.mro4.dec.com (USENET News System) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 41