Article View: sci.electronics
Article #15836Flywheel Failure
From: Fred Leffingwell
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:41
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:41
20 lines
1239 bytes
1239 bytes
There is a lot of speculation on this subject and not much aggreement. I have read (in Scientific American many years ago and in more recent Popular Science I think) that there is not the same danger level from modern flywheel designs as would be the case from a steel plate for example. My thought is - haven't any of the tests been run to the failure point? Have any actual working prototypes been built? It would seem not. This was easy to understand 15 or more years ago when I read the first article, but now it really seems ludicrous. So Is the real reason for not storing energy in a flywheel the danger? If so why the comments that the things simply fail in a cotton candy like fluff? Fred Leffingwell (fredl@olivetti.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<57411@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!fredlReferences:
<1gov35INNik@gap.caltech.edu> <1992Dec1 <77845@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!fredl From: fredl@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Fred Leffingwell) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,sci.energy,rec.autos.tech Subject: Flywheel Failure Message-ID: <57411@olivea.atc.olivetti.com> Date: 18 Dec 92 18:41:56 GMT References: <1gov35INNik@gap.caltech.edu> <1992Dec1 <77845@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> Sender: news@olivea.atc.olivetti.com Followup-To: sci.electronics Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino CA, USA Lines: 21