Re: Flywheel Failure

Article View: sci.electronics

Article #15853

#15853

From: Phil Ngai
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:34

13 lines
903 bytes

In article <57411@olivea.atc.olivetti.com> fredl@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Fred Leffingwell) writes:
>	So Is the real reason for not storing energy in a flywheel
>	the danger?  If so why the comments that the things simply
>	fail in a cotton candy like fluff?

Ah, the fluff argument again.

Would you agree that a gas is even less dangerous than cotton candy?

Now, let me expose you to a blow torch. It's only hot gas, right?

-- 
My opinions are my own.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec18.213437.27052@adobe.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!purdue!decwrl!adobe!pngai

References: <1992Dec1 <77845@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> <57411@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.electronics,sci.energy
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!purdue!decwrl!adobe!pngai
From: pngai@adobe.com (Phil Ngai)
Subject: Re: Flywheel Failure
Message-ID: <1992Dec18.213437.27052@adobe.com>
Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS)
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated
References: <1992Dec1 <77845@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> <57411@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:34:37 GMT
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message