Article View: sci.electronics
Article #15876Re: Telephone Headsets
From: Thomas David Kehoe
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 17:32
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 17:32
85 lines
4558 bytes
4558 bytes
>I've been looking into telephone headsets (the things that telephone >operators usually wear) and the prices are much higher than I expected: >$160 - $200 and UP. Basically, the thing consists of half a headphone, >a microphone, and a small amplifier. I would have thought that the price >would be $60 to $80. Does anyone know why they are so expensive; or, >does anyone know a source where the price is more reasonable?? Thanks. Radio Shack sells a headset & universal amplifier for $49.95. The frequency response of the headset is seriously non-flat (too much high end). The $230 ACS headset I tried sounded similar. I haven't tried Plantronics or Hello Direct, the two other major headset manufacturers (I can send you their phone #'s if you want). Instead, I bought a Yaesu YH-1 ham radio headset for $31 ($25 wholesale). Excellent sound, attractive styling, folds up for carrying, and a standard 1/8" stereo plug. The microphone connects directly to my phone, which has an elecret microphone. The microphone seems a tad less sensitive than my handset microphone, but very few people complain. The earpiece is much quieter than the earpiece in my handset (and far better sound). Turning up the volume on my phone works, but with lots of distortion. So I put in a little LM386 op-amp. Sounds great. Total cost is $<40. Which leaves the question why does the same thing from Plantronics cost $185? -- FCC certification costs $5K+. That seems ridiculous, for someone to see that my microphone connects straight through, and my earpiece has a little op-amp. -- My headset only works with one type of phone (AT&T 700 series). I had to add a 0.1uF capacitor from the earpiece (red) wire to ground (black and green) wires. Who knows what other things you have to add to other phones. The Radio Shack headset interface has three settings: I think they are insensitive electret, sensitive electret, and carbon microphone. So it has some type of amplifier for the microphone. Remember that carbon (round) microphones vary resistance, and electret (square) microphones vary capacitance. Also, I called AT&T with a question, and was told by six people that technical support is never given because modifying a telephone is a federal crime (using an uncertified headset is such a modification). - The better amplifiers have compression and other features to limit the headset to 85dB (an OSHA rule). This is so that if someone else in the office sends a fax on line you're talking on, you don't get 130dB of high-pitched sound in your ear. Now, I have a question. I'm using a bucket brigade delay between my microphone and earpiece, as a treatment for stuttering. The delay circuit can either be powered by battery or plug-in power supply. The latter goes throgh a 7805 voltage regulator, which eliminates hum. I can plug this into the handset jack of my phone and it sounds fine. But when I plug it into the Radio Shack universal telephone amp (which plugs into my phone), I hear a 60 Hz hum. Specifically, connecting the microphone (yellow) wire causes hum. The other three wires don't. Disconnecting my phone from the phone line eliminates the hum, but unplugging my phone's power doesn't (it just turns off the answering machine). I assume this hum has something to do with the phone line's ground being 3 volts off of the power line's ground. The hum is eliminated when I power my delay from the battery. I tried a capacitor between my microphone (with its own driver) and the yellow wire. This eliminated the hum, but people said they couldn't hear me. That makes no sense, as the capacitor should pass AC signals. Anything else I should try? Maybe a giant (4700 uF) capacitor between +5v and ground on my delay circuit? I tried connecting the delay circuit ground to earth ground, but this caused a loud, nasty sound. -- "Why my thoughts are my own, when they are in, but when they are out they are another's." - Susannah Martin, hanged for witchcraft, 1692. Thomas David Kehoe kehoe@netcom.com (408) 354-5926
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec19.173210.5420@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!kehoeReferences:
<1992Dec18.230348.18944@opus.hunt.inmet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!kehoe From: kehoe@netcom.com (Thomas David Kehoe) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Telephone Headsets Message-ID: <1992Dec19.173210.5420@netcom.com> Date: 19 Dec 92 17:32:10 GMT References: <1992Dec18.230348.18944@opus.hunt.inmet.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Lines: 85