🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <57411@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>, fredl@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Fred Leffingwell) writes:
>	So Is the real reason for not storing energy in a flywheel
>	the danger?  If so why the comments that the things simply
>	fail in a cotton candy like fluff?

Because the people promoting this technology want you to ignore the law of
conservation of energy, and believe "If it's fluffy, it cant POSSIBLY be
dangerous."   You've fallen for their bullshit hook, line, and sinker.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL

Disclaimer:  Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS.  That's what I get paid for.  My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below).  So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it.  If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.