🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16049

Re: ECL logic computers ?

#16049
From: "Jerome Grimmer"
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1991 20:40
38 lines
2539 bytes
John West <andreww@uniwa.uwa.oz> writes:
>rbennet1@gara.une.oz.au (Robert Bennetts) writes:
>>   can anybody out there tell me why ECL logic is not used to construct
>>computers (to my knowledge anyway) considering the quite fast speeds it can
>>run at.I know it uses more power than CMOS logic,
>>...but if it could
>>run at the above speed [400-500MHz], wouldn't it be worth the effort.
>
>As far as I'm aware, the main reason is price. ECL is not cheap. Some
>high-end machines do in fact use it, and they benefit from the extra
>speed. But you pay for it. ECL chips are low-density (transistor size,
>power consumption (too many gates and it melts)). Also, to run at
>500MHz, you'd need rather fast RAM. OK, you say - build that with ECL as
>well. Unfortunately... a few meg of ECL SRAM would fill a VERY large
>box, require some very expensive cooling, and cost an absolute FORTUNE!.
>People like their PCs small, cheap to buy and cheap to run. You could
>run an ECL CPU with normal DRAM, but you'd lose almost all of the extra
>speed.

While this is true that ECL SRAM would fill a large box and be very
expensive, disregarding price, an ECL computer is still possible and you could
use normal DRAM without losing most of the extra speed, your processor would
necessarily be larger physically.  You would need to endow it with LOTS of
registers (ala RISC I) and probably it would be desirable to force arithmetic
instructions to work with registers only.  An internal stack for storing return
addresses would also be an advantage.  If I were to design this, I would also
set up some ECL SRAM for a cache memory, (oh, say 64K or so, depending upon the
total addressable space of the computer) to further increase speed while still
being able to use normal DRAMS for main memory.

I think that in time (perhaps shorter than we think) CMOS may pass up current
ECL specifications for speed.

Jerome Grimmer
1st yr Senior EE at Southern Illinois University-Carbondale.
ST6267@siucvmb.cdale.siu.edu          (Hey, it's a 5-yr program! :-))
ST6267@SIUCVMB.BITNET
ap429@cleveland.freenet.edu <--where I read my news.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9106271942.AA06031@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!SIUCVMB.CDALE.SIU.EDU!ST6267

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!SIUCVMB.CDALE.SIU.EDU!ST6267
From: ST6267@SIUCVMB.CDALE.SIU.EDU ("Jerome Grimmer")
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: ECL logic computers ?
Message-ID: <9106271942.AA06031@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 27 Jun 91 20:40:16 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 38