Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16114Re: Etchant types
From: Don Montgomery
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 00:43
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 00:43
14 lines
978 bytes
978 bytes
In sci.electronics, v064mb9k@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (NEIL GANDLER) writes: > What are the advantages of Ferric Chloride vs. Ammonium Persulphate. I used to use a commercial Ammonium Persulfate etch. It used a mercury compound as a catalyst and mercury is pretty poisonous. You might check the -persulfate etch you're using to see if it contains mercury. BTW, I was heating the etchant on the little lady's stove to speed the pro- cess...the dish broke spilling the persulfate all over the chrome-plated burner and instantly copper-plated it. Don Montgomery donrm@sr.hp.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7380107@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!donrmReferences:
<C0vrzx.77p@acsu.buffalo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: donrm@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com (Don Montgomery) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 00:43:46 GMT Subject: Re: Etchant types Message-ID: <7380107@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com> Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Rosa, CA Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!donrm Newsgroups: sci.electronics References: <C0vrzx.77p@acsu.buffalo.edu> Lines: 14