Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16223Re: What really Failed on Fluorescent Lamp
From: Daniel Burstein
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 22:57
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 22:57
21 lines
1265 bytes
1265 bytes
to the person who had the ballast burn-out problem. Keep in mind that early (pre 1965?) ballasts may have had PCB laced insulation inside, so be CAREFUL with the material. While I have sever doubts about the validity of the scare stories about PCB's, it never hurts to wear gloves, etc... ----------------- As long as you're replacing the unit, you might want to check out the high-frequency ballasts that have recently become available. Rather than use the line frequency, which can leave your flourescents with a noticable flicker (especially when you're using them around electrical equipment), these are in the khz range, tend to be smaller and lighter, and (supposedely) use less power than the more traidtional units. (remember, the lamp may use 40 watts, but the ballast will also use a bit of energy.... typically about 15% of the lamp rating) dannyb@panix.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan4.225724.29960@panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!panix!dannybReferences:
<1993Jan3.145525.28378@osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu> <86132@ut-emx.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!panix!dannyb From: dannyb@panix.com (Daniel Burstein) Subject: Re: What really Failed on Fluorescent Lamp Message-ID: <1993Jan4.225724.29960@panix.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 22:57:24 GMT References: <1993Jan3.145525.28378@osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu> <86132@ut-emx.uucp> Organization: Panix, NYC Lines: 22