Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16248Re: 110/220 V AC why ?
From: Bill Mayhew
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 13:45
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 13:45
23 lines
1441 bytes
1441 bytes
The choice of 117 VAC RMS nominal in the US is more of a political choice than a choice of technical merit. In the early days of development of power distribution in the US, there was bitter rivalry between Edison, a proponent of of DC generation and distribution, and Westinghouse, an AC generation proponent. Edison's company spread fear stories about the supposed inherent danger of AC current versus DC. Of course, it makes sense to keep the voltage in the distribution system at as high a potential as possible to reduce energy losses to resistive heating in the wire. Note that out-of-phase current may deliver no power to the load, but does cause heating loss in the wire carring the current. Energy loss is greater for low voltage distribution systems. Re: the previous posting: a lower AWG number on wire denotes a larger corss sectional area. -- Bill Mayhew NEOUCOM Computer Services Department Rootstown, OH 44272-9995 USA phone: 216-325-2511 wtm@uhura.neoucom.edu (140.220.1.1) 146.580: N8WED
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan05.134551.23468@uhura.neoucom.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!neoucom.edu!wtmReferences:
<gate.i8JPwB1w165w@toz.buffalo.ny.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!neoucom.edu!wtm From: wtm@uhura.neoucom.edu (Bill Mayhew) Subject: Re: 110/220 V AC why ? Message-ID: <1993Jan05.134551.23468@uhura.neoucom.edu> Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine References: <gate.i8JPwB1w165w@toz.buffalo.ny.us> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 13:45:51 GMT Lines: 23