Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16313Re: caller id block
From: Dan Borkowski
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:10
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:10
59 lines
3839 bytes
3839 bytes
In article <1350.442.uupcb@ozonehole.com>, gerald.belton@ozonehole.com (Gerald Belton) wrote: > > Here at Tulane we have a PBX system where each phone has its own number; > you dial directly to the phone on my desk. A friend of mine has caller > ID, and the number that shows on his caller ID box is NOT the number you > would have to call to reach me. In fact, it isn't the same number every > time I call. He has tried calling the number that shows up on his > caller ID box, and it just rings with no answer. The Caller ID service does not adequately address the PBX cases. The concept of a PBX is basically to provide phone service to a (could be large) number of extension phones with a relatively few number of actual trunks (phone lines) to the public switched telephone network (PSTN), thereby saving $$$ on trunk connection charges. As an example, you could have one hundred extensions but only ten trunks to the PSTN. This means that all one hundred phones could be in use simultaneously (if the PBX power supplies can handle that), but only ten of those could be connected to a party that is not on the PBX (i.e., in the outside world); the remainder of the extensions would be limited to talking with other extensions. When someone from the outside world dials the telephone number of one of the extensions, the PSTN routes the call to the telephone company's central office (CO) which is connected to the PBX. That CO then grabs one of the (available) connecting trunks and pulses the dialed extension number; the PBX recognizes the extension number and routes the call to the correct extension. This process is called DID -- Direct Inward Dialing. When someone on an extension phone calls someone in the outside world, the PBX grabs one of those DID trunks and outpulses the dialed number to the CO. The CO, in turn, outpulses the dialed number and includes the ANI (Automatic Number Identification -- the Caller ID). However, this ANI corresponds with the DID trunk from the PBX on which the call originated, NOT the actual PBX extension. The called person's caller ID box will display the number of the DID trunk between the PBX and the CO. If that person tried to call that number, the CO wouldn't have any extension number to put onto the DID trunk, and the PBX wouldn't know where to route the call. One would expect some sort of error message in this case, but those error messages are generated by the telephone company, and the telco is routing the call properly here. The PBX just isn't reacting kindly and is just dumping the call into lala land, allowing the caller to hear ringback forever. I guess it would be nice if the PBX could spit out a message, but that may be something too complex for the PBX to handle. Besides, that would mean that the caller's call would be completed, and they would have to pay to listen to the message. The problem with the standard is that the originating CO is responsible for placing the ANI into the signalling data for the call. There is no provision for the ANI to be shipped to the originating CO by the PBX (or any other CPE) for inclusion with the call. (If that provision did exist, it would allow anyone to modify their ANI and give a false caller ID.) Dan Borkowski GTE Laboratories Incorporated dborkowski@gte.com ------------------- This opinion is all mine...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dborkowski-220193140904@dborkowski.gte.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.centerline.com!noc.near.net!ceylon!dborkowski.gte.com!userReferences:
<1350.442.uupcb@ozonehole.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.centerline.com!noc.near.net!ceylon!dborkowski.gte.com!user From: dborkowski@gte.com (Dan Borkowski) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: caller id block Message-ID: <dborkowski-220193140904@dborkowski.gte.com> Date: 22 Jan 93 20:10:28 GMT References: <1350.442.uupcb@ozonehole.com> Sender: news@ceylon.gte.com Followup-To: sci.electronics Organization: GTE Laboratories Lines: 59