Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16438Re: "1-bit DAC"
From: Massoud Ajami
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 22:01
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 22:01
20 lines
1384 bytes
1384 bytes
In article <C0F8Hp.84n@ve7frg.ampr.org> doug@ve7frg.ampr.org (Doug Collinge - VE7GNU) writes: >From: doug@ve7frg.ampr.org (Doug Collinge - VE7GNU) >Subject: "1-bit DAC" >Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 07:22:37 GMT >If my CD with a "1 bit DAC" and the aid of "8 times oversampling" >can produce audio as good as an older CD with no "oversampling" and >a 16-bit DAC then can my circuit with an 8-bit DAC be replaced >with a 1-bit DAC and 4-times oversampling? > >How? What's the math behind this concept anyway? You are right but: Eight times oversampling requires 2 bits dynamic range from sample to sample for the signal with 96dB abrupt change (16 bits). Since the voice and music don't have such changes, then, one bit range from sample to the next is suficient. The 8 bits and 4 times oversampling works if you don't saturate your DAC due to the fast rise/fall of the signal. -- Peace and Prosperity! ---==< 110 >==---
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<massoud.176.726357719@chemteca.sdsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usc!newshub.sdsu.edu!chemteca.sdsu.edu!massoudReferences:
<C0F8Hp.84n@ve7frg.ampr.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usc!newshub.sdsu.edu!chemteca.sdsu.edu!massoud From: massoud@chemteca.sdsu.edu (Massoud Ajami) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: "1-bit DAC" Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 22:01:59 GMT Organization: San Diego State University Lines: 20 Message-ID: <massoud.176.726357719@chemteca.sdsu.edu> References: <C0F8Hp.84n@ve7frg.ampr.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.191.227.22