Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16530Re: caller id block
From: Todd Inch
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:38
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:38
17 lines
1367 bytes
1367 bytes
In article <betel.727244356@camelot> betel@camelot.bradley.edu (Robert Crawford) writes: > A more interesting (to me) question: How could someone _with_ >caller ID screen calls that do not include the information? My idea is >for the "black box" to sit between an answering machine and the >telephone, and to not pass the ring signal unless the caller ID >information comes along... Great - if you don't want to receive any long-distance calls. Calls from other exchanges, especially in distant places, may not contain the CID info because the necessary SS-7 protocal has not be implemented everywhere yet. Now if you can distinguish between "blocked" and "not available", that would work fine. This is probably dependant upon your hardware, but may also be dependant upon how your local telco has things set up - they may send one message for both conditions (although hopefully not!)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan25.203845.8439@mav.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!caen!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!gtisqr!toddiReferences:
<1993Jan16.132013.2357@doug.cae.wisc.edu> <1993Jan17.013408.5389@phx.mcd.mot.com> <betel.727244356@camelot>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!caen!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!gtisqr!toddi From: toddi@mav.com (Todd Inch) Subject: Re: caller id block Message-ID: <1993Jan25.203845.8439@mav.com> Organization: Maverick International Inc. References: <1993Jan16.132013.2357@doug.cae.wisc.edu> <1993Jan17.013408.5389@phx.mcd.mot.com> <betel.727244356@camelot> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 20:38:45 GMT Lines: 17