Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16553Re: Flywheel batteries as EV power source
From: Robert F. Drury
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 12:55
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 12:55
49 lines
3481 bytes
3481 bytes
In article <1992Dec28.220947.19148@michael.apple.com>,
ems@michael.apple.com (E. Michael Smith) wrote:
>
> In article <1hnnrdINNnna@gap.caltech.edu> carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU writes:
> >In article <1992Dec22.204130.18133@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>, () writes:
> >=Obviously this fluff created by a failed flywheel is not exactly safe. But
> >=you contain this fluff inside another carbon carbon shell such that the
> >=expanding hot fluff makes more fluff until the energy is such that it can
> >=be contained by a container. The object is not to stop the flywheel failure
> >=at any given point, but to slow it down and cause it to loose energy.
> >
> >Yup. Now, since someone has calculated that the flywheel is storing enough
> >energy to VAPORIZE 40 kilograms of iron, just how big is your containment
> >system going to be? Will there be room for people in the car?
>
> Hmmm ... an interesting question arises from this oft' posted phrase
> 'VAPORIZE 40 kilograms of iron' ... Since this is only 88 lbs of
> stuff (and my car weighs about 2000lbs) it isn't THAT much of a
> weight penalty ... So just how much of a very high heat of vaporization
> substance would it take to absorbe the heat as phase change? Say, for
> example, water? (Or whatever is even better suited...). If one could
> wrap the flywheel in a 200 lb water jacket and still be lighter than
> a lead/acid battery pack, it might still be 'reasonable' ...
>
> Now, getting all that KE dumped evenly into the water jacket could be
> quite a trick ;-) and will be left as an excersize for the reader ;-) ;-)
>
> --
>
> E. Michael Smith ems@apple.COM
>
> 'Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has
> genius, power and magic in it.' - Goethe
>
> I am not responsible nor is anyone else. Everything is disclaimed.
Well, I just can't let this one pass...I have to add my $.02 to this
*interminable* thread. Would anyone out there care to be in the same car,
or for that matter within several hundred yards of a car, where 200 lb of
water had suddenly and very rapidly been converted to superheated steam?
This would convert the whole car and occupents (sp?) to a large
fragmentation grendade. Just because something is vaporized does not mean
it is rendered harmless; hot, expanding gases are what do the damage in all
explosions. When water is vaporized, it's volume increases ~1000X, so that
200lb of water(25 gallons) suddenly wants to take up 25,000 gallons; wants
to *bad*. If constrained to remain at its original volume, it will be at
1000 atmospheres, attained within microseconds. The pressure vessel
capable of containing this *will* weigh more than a battery pack, or a car.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<drury-070193073338@esrfd.es.dupont.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatekeeper.es.dupont.com!esds01.es.dupont.com!esrfd.es.dupont.com!userReferences:
<51694@seismo.CSS.GOV> <1992Dec22.204130.18133@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com> <1hnnrdINNnna@gap.caltech.edu> <1992Dec28.220947.19148@michael.apple.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatekeeper.es.dupont.com!esds01.es.dupont.com!esrfd.es.dupont.com!user From: drury@esvax.dunet.dupont.com (Robert F. Drury) Subject: Re: Flywheel batteries as EV power source Message-ID: <drury-070193073338@esrfd.es.dupont.com> Followup-To: sci.electronics,sci.energy,rec.autos Sender: news@es.dupont.com (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: esrfd.es.dupont.com Organization: Du Pont Electronics References: <51694@seismo.CSS.GOV> <1992Dec22.204130.18133@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com> <1hnnrdINNnna@gap.caltech.edu> <1992Dec28.220947.19148@michael.apple.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 12:55:20 GMT Lines: 49