🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16895

150 - 200 W. Amplifier

#16895
From: C.M. Hicks
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:35
35 lines
2354 bytes
wtm@uhura.neoucom.edu (Bill Mayhew) writes:

>The biggest problem is that there is not very much high quality
>source material available.  Most commercially available recordigns
>are bad enough that they don't sound much better on a multi
>kilobuck stereo than a cheap boombox.

I disagree - if you know where to look there is a large number of excellent
recordings around. Generally I look for the name of the engineer on the
sleeve, as well as the artists, before deciding what to buy.
The Chandos label springs to mind - it is a family-run
label with father and son as producer and engineer respectively, working
with the top orchestras in the UK. I've never bought a duff CD from them. 

However, I know nothing about rock/pop etc - "classical" and jazz for me :-)
 
>The biggest problem I've seen in cheap sound equipment is woefully
>lousy power supplies.  Plenty of improvement can be had without
>resorting fancy polyproylene dielectric capacitors, but with
>properly sized transformers and capacitors.  Active regulation does
>wonders.

I can't agree with this enough - good power supplies are expensive, and tend
to get left out of cheap equipment. Does anyone have experience with
switchmode power supplies for audio power-amps? It seems a good idea on
the surface (low weight, high efficiency, low output impedance up to
several MHz), but I can see problems with interference from the high-energy
switching circuits.

Christopher Hicks
--
 ==============================================================================
 Christopher Hicks    |    If it doesn't fit...
 cmh@uk.ac.cam.eng    |                        ...you need a bigger hammer.
 ==============================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan27.163500.3906@eng.cam.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!cam-eng!cmh
References: <C19H1r.1Ko@waterloo.hp.com> <1993Jan25.085151.25340@mr.med.ge.com> <1993Jan26.144230.2613@uhura.neoucom.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!cam-eng!cmh
From: cmh@eng.cam.ac.uk (C.M. Hicks)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: 150 - 200 W. Amplifier
Message-ID: <1993Jan27.163500.3906@eng.cam.ac.uk>
Date: 27 Jan 93 16:35:00 GMT
References: <C19H1r.1Ko@waterloo.hp.com> <1993Jan25.085151.25340@mr.med.ge.com> <1993Jan26.144230.2613@uhura.neoucom.edu>
Sender: cmh@eng.cam.ac.uk (C.M. Hicks)
Organization: cam.eng
Lines: 35
Nntp-Posting-Host: club.eng.cam.ac.uk